Re: Question on Index Replication

2010-02-16 Thread Lance Norskog
iple servers share one read-only copy of the >> >> index? >> >> >> >> so one server (Master) builds the index and it is stored on a SAN. Then >> >> multiple Slave servers point to the same copy of the data and answer >> user >> >

Re: Question on Index Replication

2010-02-15 Thread Erick Erickson
e Slave servers point to the same copy of the data and answer > user > >> queries. > >> > >> In the replication diagram, I see that the index is being copied on each > >> of > >> the Slave servers. > >> > >> This

Re: Question on Index Replication

2010-02-15 Thread abhishes
;> >> In the replication diagram, I see that the index is being copied on each >> of >> the Slave servers. >> >> This is not desirable because index is read-only (for the slave servers, >> because only master updates the index) and copying of indexes can take >&g

Re: Question on Index Replication

2010-02-15 Thread Erick Erickson
xes can take very > long (depending on index size) and can unnecessarily waste disk space. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Question-on-Index-Replication-tp27590418p27590418.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Question on Index Replication

2010-02-14 Thread abhishes
not desirable because index is read-only (for the slave servers, because only master updates the index) and copying of indexes can take very long (depending on index size) and can unnecessarily waste disk space. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-on-Index-Replication