Am 09.08.2011 14:58, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
while searching with debug on I see strange query parsing:
identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
+MultiPhraseQuery(identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni
bielefeld de")
+identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni bielefe
> while searching with debug on I see strange query parsing:
>
> name="rawquerystring">identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
> name="querystring">identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
>
> +MultiPhraseQuery(identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni
> bielefeld de")
>
>
> +identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de
Hi list,
while searching with debug on I see strange query parsing:
identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
identifier:"ub.uni-bielefeld.de"
+MultiPhraseQuery(identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni bielefeld de")
+identifier:"(ub.uni-bielefeld.de ub) uni bielefeld de"
It is a PhraseQuery, but
-
Hey ...
10x for you reply ... unfortunately this is not a case for me ..
I have canceled the feature which needs this ...
KInd regards
Armando
Erick Erickson wrote:
One thing I've seen suggested is to add the number of values to
a separate field, say topic_count. Then, in your situation abov
One thing I've seen suggested is to add the number of values to
a separate field, say topic_count. Then, in your situation above
you could append "AND topic_count=1". This can extend
to work if you wanted any number of matches (and only
that number). For instance,
topic=5 AND topic=10 AND topic=20
Hey
Thank you for your reply .. but it's not working ... I still get other
articles
Kind regards
Armando
Abdelhamid ABID wrote:
Well, here what I figure out !
(mm=1<50% , qf=topic , q="1" "0" ) ==> q=topic:0 or topic:1
On 3/22/10, Armando Ota wrote:
Hi
I need a little help with quer
Well, here what I figure out !
(mm=1<50% , qf=topic , q="1" "0" ) ==> q=topic:0 or topic:1
On 3/22/10, Armando Ota wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I need a little help with query for my problem (if it can be solved)
>
> I have a field in a document called topic
>
> this field contains some values, 0 (for no
Hi
I need a little help with query for my problem (if it can be solved)
I have a field in a document called topic
this field contains some values, 0 (for no topic) or 1 (topic 1), 2, 3,
etc ...
It can contain many values like 1, 10, 50, etc (for 1 doc)
So now to the problem:
I would like t
: If I query for 'ferrar*' on my index, I will get 'ferrari' and 'red ferrari'
: as a result. And that's fine. But if I try to query for 'red ferrar*', I
: have to put it between double quotes as I want to grant that it will be used
: as only one term, but the '*' is being ignored, as I don't get
but the '*' is being ignored, as I don't get any result.
What should be the apropriate query for it?
FYI I am querying one standard text field.
-
http://www.nabble.com/RPG-da-Ilha-f35514.html RPG da Ilha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-ab
: Subject: Re: Please Help !! Question about Query Phrase Slop (qs) in dismax
:
:
: Please help someone...i've been waiting for an answer for the last couple of
: days & no one seems to be helping out here. I did search the wiki & this
Please don't send messages like
: >From the solr wiki, it sounded like if qs is set to 5 for example, & if the
: search term is 'child custody', only docs with 'child' & 'custody' within 5
: words of one another would be returned in results. Is this correct? If so,
No. as explained on the wiki...
>> Amount of slop on phrase q
like if qs is set to 5 for example, & if
>>>> the search term is 'child custody', only docs with 'child' & 'custody'
>>>> within 5 words of one another would be returned in results. Is this
>>>> correct? If so, it doesn'
m is 'child custody', only docs with 'child' & 'custody'
>>> within 5 words of one another would be returned in results. Is this
>>> correct? If so, it doesn't seem to be working for me. I see docs with
>>> 'child' & &#
g stop
>> words) which is resulting in bad user experience as those docs are not so
>> relevant. What more could i do to improve quality in the results?
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Please-Help-%21%21-Question-about-Query-Phrase-Slop-%28qs%29-in-dismax-tp20643003p20654906.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
ore than 5 words of one another (excluding stop
> words) which is resulting in bad user experience as those docs are not so
> relevant. What more could i do to improve quality in the results?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Please-Help-%21%21-Question-a
seem to be working for me. I see docs with
> 'child' & 'custody' more than 5 words of one another (excluding stop
> words) which is resulting in bad user experience as those docs are not so
> relevant. What more could i do to improve quality in the results?
>
m to be working for me. I see docs with 'child' & 'custody'
more than 5 words of one another (excluding stop words) which is resulting
in bad user experience as those docs are not so relevant. What more could i
do to improve quality in the results?
--
View this message in contex
18 matches
Mail list logo
