Re: Query regarding incremental index replication

2009-09-11 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Silent Surfer wrote: > Hi , > > Currently we are using Solr 1.3 and we have the following requirement. > > As we need to process very high volumes of documents (of the order of 400 > GB per day), we are planning to separate indexer(s) and searcher(s), so that > the

Re: Query regarding incremental index replication

2009-09-10 Thread Lance Norskog
There is only one index. The index has newer "segments" which represent new records and deletes to old records (sort of). Incremental replication copies new segments; putting the new segments together with the previous index makes the new index. Incremental replication under rsync does work; perha

Query regarding incremental index replication

2009-09-09 Thread Silent Surfer
Hi , Currently we are using Solr 1.3 and we have the following requirement. As we need to process very high volumes of documents (of the order of 400 GB per day), we are planning to separate indexer(s) and searcher(s), so that there won't be performance hit. Our idea is to have have a set of s