Indeed - one of my shards had it listed as "text" doh!
thanks for the assurance that led me to find my bug
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > omitNorms="true"/>
>
> This will giv
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> omitNorms="true"/>
This will give you an exact match. As I said, if it's not, then you
didn't restart and reindex, or you are querying the wrong field.
-Yonik
At the moment for "string", I have:
is there an example type so that it will do exact matches?
Would "alphaOnlySort" do the trick? It looks like it might.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Yonik Se
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Ian Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I require an exact field match in a query. For instance, if a
> title field contains "Nature" or "Nature Cell Biology", when I search
> title:Nature I only want "Nature" and not "Nature Cell Biology". Is
> that someth
How can I require an exact field match in a query. For instance, if a
title field contains "Nature" or "Nature Cell Biology", when I search
title:Nature I only want "Nature" and not "Nature Cell Biology". Is
that something I do as a query or do I need to re index it with the
field defined in a cert