On 4/12/2018 1:46 AM, LOPEZ-CORTES Mariano-ext wrote:
In our search application we have one facet filter (Status)
Each status value corresponds to multiple values in the Solr database
Example : Status : Initialized --> status in solr = 11I, 12I, 13I, 14I, ...
On status value click, search is
Hi,
What is the number of these status indicators? It is expected to have slower
query if you have more clauses since Solr/Lucene has to load postings for each
term and then OR them. The real question is why it is constantly slow since you
are using fq and it should be cached. Did you disable fi
Hi
In our search application we have one facet filter (Status)
Each status value corresponds to multiple values in the Solr database
Example : Status : Initialized --> status in solr = 11I, 12I, 13I, 14I, ...
On status value click, search is re-fired with fq filter:
fq: status:(11I OR 12I OR
: So as I said, the search result I want is the one with the highest score,
: but I was hoping to find a way to boost the score based on the number of
: terms it finds (or matches well) so that I can differentiate between a close
: match and nowhere near. Any suggestions?
In general, this already
_fields.29
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: dm_tim
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Query question
Howdy,
I have a straight-forward index that contains a "name" field. I am currently
taking a string of text, tokenizin
of
terms it finds (or matches well) so that I can differentiate between a close
match and nowhere near. Any suggestions?
Regards,
T
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-question-tp4040559.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; Regards,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp4019898.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
I just discovered the idf scoring component and it's biting me on the butt.
In the particular case I have all terms are equally relevant. Is there any
way to turn off idf scoring?
Regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp40
That is terrific. Thanks.
Regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp4019397p4019890.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
; Tim
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp4019397p4019426.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
k correct?
Regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp4019397p4019426.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Any help would be
appreciated.
Regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/4-0-query-question-tp4019397.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
THANKS for your relay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/facet-range-query-question-tp3976026p3983783.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
urn the facet range automatically like this:
> 10
> 200
> 200
> 100
> 10
>
>
> does any one know something like this, or other functions can implement my
> requirement ?
> please give me a favor,
> Thank You
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Vi
thing like this, or other functions can implement my
requirement ?
please give me a favor,
Thank You
Andy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/facet-range-query-question-tp3976026.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Thanks Yonik. I have a follow on now, how does Solr ensure consistent
> results across pages? So for example if we had my 3 theoretical solr
> instances again and a, b and c each returned 100 documents with the same
> score and the user only
Thanks Yonik. I have a follow on now, how does Solr ensure consistent
results across pages? So for example if we had my 3 theoretical solr
instances again and a, b and c each returned 100 documents with the same
score and the user only requested 100 documents, how are those 100 documents
chosen f
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am currently experimenting with the Solr Cloud code on trunk and just had
> a quick question. Lets say my setup had 3 nodes a, b and c. Node a has
> 1000 results which meet a particular query, b has 2000 and c has 3000. When
> executing t
I am currently experimenting with the Solr Cloud code on trunk and just had
a quick question. Lets say my setup had 3 nodes a, b and c. Node a has
1000 results which meet a particular query, b has 2000 and c has 3000. When
executing this query and asking for row 900 what specifically happens? F
iel Baughman
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 12:34:54 PM
> Subject: Newb query question
>
> Is there a way to perform string logic on the key field using a subquery or
> some other method.
>
>
>
> IE. If the left 4 characters of t
How about something like:
for exclusion
+*:* -KEY:abcd*
for inclusion
+*:* +KEY:abcd*
Best
Erick
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Baughman wrote:
> Is there a way to perform string logic on the key field using a subquery or
> some other method.
>
>
>
> IE. If the left 4 characters of th
Is there a way to perform string logic on the key field using a subquery or
some other method.
IE. If the left 4 characters of the key are ABCD, then include or exclude
those from the search.
Here is the "laymans" pseudo code for what I'm wanting to do:
*:* AND LEFT(KEY, 4) <> 'abcd'
My actual:
INFO: [] webapp=null path=/select
params={timeAllowed=3&qt=dismax&q=columbia&rows=1&facet.field={!ex%3Dcat}categories&facet.field={!ex%3Dadv}adventures&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.mincount=1&fq={!tag%3Dcat}categories:Boots&fq={!tag%3Dadv}adventures:Camping}
hits=1 status=0 QTi
Sorry. It was hand typed, it is the other way around. It is part of the actual,
but I did not copy and paste it.
q=query&fq={!tag=cat}categories:Jackets&fq={!tag=adv}adventures:Camping&facet.field={!ex=cat}categories&facet.field={!ex=adv}adventures
On Feb 27, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tim Christensen
wrote:
> q=query&fq={!ex=cat}categories:Jackets&fq={!ex=adv}adventures:Camping&facet.field={!tag=cat}categories&facet.field={!tag=adv}adventures
If this is the actual command you used, it looks like you switched
"ex" and "tag"?
-Yonik
http://lucid
Okay -- so I did see that before and I tested it. It does work for example when
I do this:
q=query&fq={!ex=cat}categories:Jackets&facet.field={!tag=cat}categories
Thank you for that part. What I don't get is any of the other facet fields
returning their full list of values. So in my case I need
Hi,
LocalParam {!tag} and {!ex} will help you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 28. feb. 2011, at 00.41, Tim Christensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do the following
if i'm understanding your question, it sounds like
localparams/tagging/exclusion might be what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
hth,
rob
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Tim Christensen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do the
> I am trying to do the following:
>
> Where a query might return:
>
> Facet 1
> A
> B
> C
>
> Facet 2
> X
> Y
> Z
>
> User selects Facet 1 option A. Normally this paradigm would
> contract the results as in a refining paradigm. That would
> be fine and the obvious UI change. But by doing so, F
Hi,
I am trying to do the following:
Where a query might return:
Facet 1
A
B
C
Facet 2
X
Y
Z
User selects Facet 1 option A. Normally this paradigm would contract the
results as in a refining paradigm. That would be fine and the obvious UI
change. But by doing so, Facet 2 option X is no longe
gt; Cc: kenf_nc
> Subject: Re: Query question
>
> Another alternative (prettier to my eye), would be:
>
> (city:Chicago AND Romantic AND View)^10 OR (Romantic AND View)
>
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> On 11/03/2010 09:28 AM, kenf_nc wrote:
> > Unfortunately the de
Another alternative (prettier to my eye), would be:
(city:Chicago AND Romantic AND View)^10 OR (Romantic AND View)
-Mike
On 11/03/2010 09:28 AM, kenf_nc wrote:
Unfortunately the default operator is set to AND and I can't change that at
this time.
If I do (city:Chicago^10 OR Romantic OR Vi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-question-tp1828367p1834793.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> My impression was that
>
> city:Chicago^10 +Romantic +View
>
> would do what you want (with the standard lucene query
> parser and default operator OR), and I'm not sure about
> this, but I have a feeling that the version with "Boolean"
> operators AND/OR and parens might actually net out to th
My impression was that
city:Chicago^10 +Romantic +View
would do what you want (with the standard lucene query parser and
default operator OR), and I'm not sure about this, but I have a feeling
that the version with "Boolean" operators AND/OR and parens might
actually net out to the same thing
> Erick, that query would return all restaurants in Chicago,
> whether they
> matched Romantic View or not. Although the scores should
> sort relevant
> results to the top, the results would still contain a lot
> of things I wasn't
> interested in.
How about this one?
+(city:Chicago^1000 OR (*:*
hould sort relevant
> results to the top, the results would still contain a lot of things I
> wasn't
> interested in.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-question-tp1828367p1828639.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Don't worry about that line. It just means that one particular kind of
'default' behavior in bq shouldn't be relied upon, if you don't entirely
understand that behavior they're saying is deprecated (as I don't
either!) anyway, don't worry about it, just supply an explicit boost in
your bq.
b
s message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-question-tp1828367p1828639.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Chicago (or even if it's missing the city field), but matches the other
> query parameters it should still come back in the results. Is something
> like
> this possible? It's kind of like q=(some query) optional boost if
> field:value.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
&g
I think you'll find the dismax request handler helpful in general, it
supports more flexible query wrangling like that.
With the dismax request handler, I think the bq (boost query) parameter
will do what you need, eg:
bq=city:Chicago^5.0
The ^5.0 is how much boost you want, you can play aro
ind of like q=(some query) optional boost if
field:value.
Thanks,
Ken
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-question-tp1828367p1828367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Grant,
Thanks for the explanation.
Regards
ericz
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
>
> > Hi Solr Community
> >
> > If you use a filter like:
> > q=*:*
> > fq=make:Volkswagen
> >
> > and then the next query is:
> >
On Aug 30, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Solr Community
>
> If you use a filter like:
> q=*:*
> fq=make:Volkswagen
>
> and then the next query is:
> q=blue
> fq=make:Volkswagen
>
> will Solr use the filter cache before the main query, or only after a "blue"
> subset?
The firs
Hi Solr Community
If you use a filter like:
q=*:*
fq=make:Volkswagen
and then the next query is:
q=blue
fq=make:Volkswagen
will Solr use the filter cache before the main query, or only after a "blue"
subset?
In other words will this query make more sense?
q=(blue) AND (make:Volkswagen)
What analyzer you are using to index and search? Check out schema.xml. You
are currently using analyzer which breaks the words. If you don't want to
break then you need to use .
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:41 PM, M.Rizwan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have solr 1.4.
Hi,
I have solr 1.4. In schema i have a field called "title" of type "text"
Now problem is, when I search for "Test_Title" it brings all documents with
titles like "Test-Title", "Test_Title", "Test,Title, "Test Title",
"Test.Title"
What to do to avoid this?
"Test_Title" should only return documen
d(created),4,4,4)^200.0&f.changed.facet.date.gap=%2B1HOUR&hl.simple.post=&facet.field=uid&facet.field=is_book_bid&facet.field=type&facet.field=language&facet.field=im_vid_3&facet.field=im_vid_1&facet.field=im_vid_2&fq=tid:1&fq=tid:3&fq=hash:c13a544eb3ac)&fq=(nodeaccess_all:0+OR+hash:c13a544eb3ac)&hl.fragsize=&facet.mincount=1&qf=tags_inline^1.0&qf=body^40&qf=tags_a^5.0&qf=name^3.0&qf=taxonomy_names^2.0&qf=title^5.0&facet.date=created&facet.date=changed&hl.fl=&json.nl=map&f.changed.facet.date.end=2010-02-10T06:18:49Z%2B1HOUR/HOUR&wt=json&rows=10&f.created.facet.date.gap=%2B1HOUR&hl.snippets=&facet.sort=true&start=0&q=drupal&f.created.facet.date.end=2010-02-10T06:18:49Z%2B1HOUR/HOUR}
> status=400 QTime=0
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Jay
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Solr-Drupal-Integration---Query-Question-tp27522362p27554055.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Peter M. Wolanin, Ph.D.
Momentum Specialist, Acquia. Inc.
peter.wola...@acquia.com
id,name,ss_image_relative&bf=recip(rord(created),4,19,19)^200.0&f.changed.facet.date.gap=%2B1HOUR&hl.simple.post=&facet.field=uid&facet.field=type&facet.field=language&fq=(nodeaccess_all:0+OR+hash:c13a544eb3ac)&hl.fragsize=&facet.mincount=1&qf=name^3.0&facet
ss_all:0+OR+hash:c13a544eb3ac)&hl.fragsize=&facet.mincount=1&qf=tags_inline^1.0&qf=body^40&qf=tags_a^5.0&qf=name^3.0&qf=taxonomy_names^2.0&qf=title^5.0&facet.date=created&facet.date=changed&hl.fl=&json.nl=map&f.changed.facet.date.end=2010-02-10T06:18:49Z%2B1HOUR/HOUR&wt=json&rows=10&f.created.facet.date.gap=%2B1HOUR&hl.snippets=&facet.sort=true&start=0&q=drupal&f.created.facet.date.end=2010-02-10T06:18:49Z%2B1HOUR/HOUR}
status=400 QTime=0
Thanks for your help,
Jay
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Solr-Drupal-Integration---Query-Question-tp27522362p27554055.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.mincount=1&qf=name^3.0&facet.date=changed&hl.fl=&json.nl=map&wt=json&f.changed.facet.date.end=2010-02-09T17:44:16Z%2B1HOUR/HOUR&rows=10&hl.snippets=&start=0&facet.sort=true&q=video}
> hits=0 status=0 QTime=0
>
> Any thoughts on the search query that gets generated by the Drupal/Solr
> module?
>
> Thanks...jay
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Solr-Drupal-Integration---Query-Question-tp27522362p27522362.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
QTime=0
Any thoughts on the search query that gets generated by the Drupal/Solr
module?
Thanks...jay
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Solr-Drupal-Integration---Query-Question-tp27522362p27522362.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
information you need for searching.
>
> e.g.-
>
>
> Ford
> Ka
>garage1
>2000
> 4000
>
>
>
-
Matt Beaumont
mibe...@yahoo.co.uk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Range-Query-question-tp24737656p24742062.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> The problem is that the indexed form of this XML is flattened so the
>
> entity has 2 garage names, 2 min values and 2 max values, but the
> grouping
> between the garage name and it's min and max values is lost. The
> danger is
> that we end up doing a comparison of the min-of-the-mins and the
ahoo.co.uk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Range-Query-question-tp24737656p24737656.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ashish P wrote:
>
> Another question what is the meaning of this syntax
> [* TO *]
>
>
It means match all tokens from the beginning to the end.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
gt;> not equal to creationuser value.
>>
>> Can we do this???
>
>
> Nope. But you can create a new field which holds true if actionuser !=
> creationuser and filter on that.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
>
--
View this message in con
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ashish P wrote:
>
> I want to query all documents where name:somevalue and actionuser value is
> not equal to creationuser value.
>
> Can we do this???
Nope. But you can create a new field which holds true if actionuser !=
creationuser and filter on that.
--
Re
Consider, I have following 3 fields
I want to query all documents where name:somevalue and actionuser value is
not equal to creationuser value.
Can we do this???
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/filter-query-question-tp22863789p22863789.html
Sent from the Solr - User
: the record is found. I was wondering how the colon character affects
: the search, and if there is another way to write a wildcard query.
most likely the issue is that your analyzer is striping out the colon
character, hence your normal phrase search works (because the colon is
striped out
I have indexed a field called courseTitle of 'text' type (as in the
schema.xml but without the stemming factory) that contains
COBOL: Data Structure
Searching with a wildcard query like
courseTitle:cobol\:* AND courseTitle:data* AND courseTitle:structure*
(the colon character ":" i
Hello all,
I am in the process of learning Solr (and the underlying Lucene
engine). I have been unable to successfully implement the following
scenario, so I was hoping someone on the list might have some insight.
- I want to index data values for different data types (fields) that
are c
62 matches
Mail list logo
