nal Message-
From: Peter Wolanin [mailto:peter.wola...@acquia.com]
Sent: 10/03/2009 12:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query Boosting using both BQ and BF
This doesn't seem to match what I'm seeing in terms of using bq -
using any value > 0 increases the sco
quot;
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 3:30:28 AM
>> Subject: RE: Query Boosting using both BQ and BF
>>
>> Some more experiments have helped me answer my own questions.
>>
>> > Q1. Can anyone confirm whether bf and b
> From: "Dean Missikowski (Consultant), CLSA"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 3:30:28 AM
> Subject: RE: Query Boosting using both BQ and BF
>
> Some more experiments have helped me answer my own questions.
>
> > Q1. Can anyone confi
ublished_date_d:[NOW-6MONTHS/DAY TO
NOW/DAY+1DAY] AND is_printed_b:true)^4.0
is_mp_parent_b:false^10.0
recip(rord(published_date_d),20,5000,5)^5.5
-Original Message-
From: Dean Missikowski (Consultant), CLSA
Sent: 08/03/2009 12:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Query Boosting using
Hi,
I have a couple of questions related to query boosting using the dismax
request handler. I'm using a recent 1.4 build (to take advantage of
omitTf), and have also tried all of this with 1.3.
To apply a query-time boost to the previous 3 months of documents in my
index I use:
published_
