Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-04 Thread Erick Erickson
Glad it's working out. I should have added that for a small set of distinct terms the performance diff between contains and prefix is probably um-measurable. If your field has 100 distinct tokens (number from thin air) well, computers are really fast Best Erick On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM,

Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-04 Thread Pritam Kute
Thanks Eric for your kind help. The field I am using is of string type and I tried escaping also, but still facet.contains doesn't work for it. As you said facet.contains is expensive, I tried facet.prefix in place and it is working fine for my requirement. Thanks again. Thanks & Regards -- Pri

Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-03 Thread Erick Erickson
Facets are collected over _tokens_, so the idea of a token containing a space is kind of odd. You _might_ be able to get past the parsing error by escaping the space. But I doubt that's what you want. I'm assuming that the field is a text field, broken up by whitespace or similar. In that case, th

Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-02 Thread Pritam Kute
Hello All, I am new user to solr and using solr 5.2.0 setup. I am trying to create multiple types of facets on same field. I am filtering the facets by using " *facet.contains*". The following is the data into field. roles : { "0/Student Name/", "1/Student Name/1000/", "0/Center Na