[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:38 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Practical number of Solr instances per machine
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Feak, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
&g
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Practical number of Solr instances per machine
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Feak, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Feak, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In our load testing, the limit for utilizing all of the processor time
> on a box was locking (synchronize, mutex, monitor, pick one). There were
> a couple of locking points that we saw.
>
> 1. Lucene's locking on the index f
Original Message-
From: Phillip Farber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Practical number of Solr instances per machine
Otis, you have a good memory :-) I guess the main thing that prompted
my question me was Mike K
ucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 5:34:58 PM
Subject: Practical number of Solr instances per machine
Hello everyone,
What is the generally accepted number of solr instances it makes sense
to run on a single machine given solr/lucene threading? Servers now
commonly have 4 or 8 cpus
58 PM
> Subject: Practical number of Solr instances per machine
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> What is the generally accepted number of solr instances it makes sense
> to run on a single machine given solr/lucene threading? Servers now
> commonly have 4 or 8 cpus. O
Hello everyone,
What is the generally accepted number of solr instances it makes sense
to run on a single machine given solr/lucene threading? Servers now
commonly have 4 or 8 cpus. Obviously the more instances you run the
bigger your JVM heap needs to be and that takes away from OS cache.
