Thanks, we tried modifying the source as suggested but found in our case
PostingsHighlighter was returning no highlighting at all once we removed the
self-closing tags. I think perhaps we were not using it in the correct way.
Robert Muir wrote
> Do you want to open a JIRA issue to just change the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:53 AM, ses wrote:
> We are trying out the new PostingsHighlighter with Solr 4.2.1 and finding
> that the highlighting section of the response includes self-closing tags
> for
> all the fields in hl.fl (by default for edismax it is all fields in qf)
> where there are no h
rameter, like
"hl.ignoreUnhighlightedFields". Or maybe "hl.returnEmptyHighlights" and
default to false to match the other highlighters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ses
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 3:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: PostingsH
We are trying out the new PostingsHighlighter with Solr 4.2.1 and finding
that the highlighting section of the response includes self-closing tags for
all the fields in hl.fl (by default for edismax it is all fields in qf)
where there are no highlighting matches. In contrast the same query on Solr
