On 24-Mar-08, at 3:32 AM, Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On 24/03/2008, at 04:39, Christian Vogler wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 01:01:59 Leonardo Santagada wrote:
I have done some modifications on the solr python client[1], and
though we kept the same license and my work could be put back in
so
Have you got a link to the new project. Many thanks.
David
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On 24/03/2008, at 15:34, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, no one h
On 24/03/2008, at 15:34, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
AFAIK, no one has fixed the outstanding bugs and indicated it was
ready to be committed.
What is the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, no one has fixed the outstanding bugs and indicated it was
> > ready to be committed.
>
> What is the preferred approach to fixing bugs
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, no one has fixed the outstanding bugs and indicated it was
> ready to be committed.
What is the preferred approach to fixing bugs in patches? Attaching new patches?
//Ed
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Leonardo Santagada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I think most of the stuff that I wanted to do is there... I
> will take a closer look and if there is omething missing I will add to
> that. Why is this on the issue tracker and was not commited to the svn?
On 24/03/2008, at 10:15, Christian Vogler wrote:
Ok, so, let's get started. I made a few modifications to SOLR-216
that fix
some unicode and timezone conversion issues, and I can upload them
wherever
we want to host the project.
There is at an outstanding XML unicode bug that was discussed
On 24/03/2008, at 09:11, Ed Summers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Leonardo Santagada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I think most of the stuff that I wanted to do is there... I
will take a closer look and if there is omething missing I will add
to
that. Why is this on the issue tr
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Leonardo Santagada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I think most of the stuff that I wanted to do is there... I
> will take a closer look and if there is omething missing I will add to
> that. Why is this on the issue tracker and was not commited to the svn?
On 24/03/2008, at 04:39, Christian Vogler wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 01:01:59 Leonardo Santagada wrote:
I have done some modifications on the solr python client[1], and
though we kept the same license and my work could be put back in solr
I think if there are more people interested we could
On Monday 24 March 2008 01:01:59 Leonardo Santagada wrote:
> I have done some modifications on the solr python client[1], and
> though we kept the same license and my work could be put back in solr
> I think if there are more people interested we could improve the
> module a lot.
Have you taken a
I have done some modifications on the solr python client[1], and
though we kept the same license and my work could be put back in solr
I think if there are more people interested we could improve the
module a lot.
As it is now it is looks to much unpythonic. Another BIG problem is
using t
12 matches
Mail list logo
