On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Eustache Felenc
wrote:
> There is also http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook with nice
> examples.
>
Thank you.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
om: Dotan Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Phrase matching with set union as opposed to set
intersection on query terms
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 6/5/2013 9:03 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
How would one write a que
> select?defType=edismax&q={!q.op=OR}search_field:term1 term2&pf=search_field
>
Is there any way to perform a fuzzy search with this method? I have
tried appending "~1" to every term in the search like so:
select?defType=edismax&q={!q.op=OR}search_field:term1~1%20term2~1&pf=search_field
However,
"Is there any other documentation that I should review?"
It's in the works! Within a week or two.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dotan Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Phrase matching with set unio
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> term1 OR term2 OR "term1 term2"^2
>
> term1 OR term2 OR "term1 term2"~10^2
>
> The latter would rank documents with the terms nearby higher, and the
> adjacent terms highest.
>
> term1 OR term2 OR "term1 term2"~10^2 OR "term1 term2"^20 OR "te
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/5/2013 9:03 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> How would one write a query which should perform set union on the
>> search terms (term1 OR term2 OR term3), and yet also perform phrase
>> matching if both terms are found? I tried a few variants of t
To further boost adjacent terms.
But the edismax pf/pf2/pf3 options might be good enough for you.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 11:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Phrase matching with set union as opposed to s
On 6/5/2013 9:03 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> How would one write a query which should perform set union on the
> search terms (term1 OR term2 OR term3), and yet also perform phrase
> matching if both terms are found? I tried a few variants of the
> following, but in every case I am getting set interse
How would one write a query which should perform set union on the
search terms (term1 OR term2 OR term3), and yet also perform phrase
matching if both terms are found? I tried a few variants of the
following, but in every case I am getting set intersection on the
search terms:
select?q={!q.op=OR}t
