>> and growing very fast! It takes lucene 30s to do the search that
>>>>>> selects 1M
>>>>>> hits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comparison is against our own implementation of a similar search
>>>>>> - but
>>&
blockjoin.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Could you point me to some more documentation?
> > >
> >
> > I can recommend only those
> >
> >
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html
> > http://www.youtu
jWH0
>
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Mihaela
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Mikhail Khludnev
> > To: solr-user ; mihaela olteanu <
> > mihaela...@yahoo.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:25 PM
> > Sub
w.youtube.com/watch?v=-OiIlIijWH0
> Thanks in advance,
> Mihaela
>
>
>
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> To: solr-user ; mihaela olteanu <
> mihaela...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Performance of cross join vs block jo
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Performance of cross join vs block join
Mihaela,
For me it's reasonable that single core join takes the same time as cross
core one. I just can't see which gain can be obtained from in the former
case.
I hardly able to comment join code
hing this topic)
, it displays an empty page.
Thanks,
Mihaela
From: Mikhail Khludnev
To: solr-user ; mihaela olteanu
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Performance of cross join vs block join
Mihaela,
For me it's reasonable that single
Mihaela,
For me it's reasonable that single core join takes the same time as cross
core one. I just can't see which gain can be obtained from in the former
case.
I hardly able to comment join code, I looked into, it's not trivial, at
least. With block join it doesn't need to obtain parentId term
v
Hello,
Does anyone know about some measurements in terms of performance for cross
joins compared to joins inside a single index?
Is it faster the join inside a single index that stores all documents of
various types (from parent table or from children tables)with a discriminator
field compared
