[mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 August 2015 00:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue with FILTER QUERY
If you're committing that rapidly then you're correct, filter caching may not
be a good fit. The entire _point_ of filter caching is to increase perfo
fectively
>> uses cache and hence it slow every time in our case.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
>> Sent: 19 August 2015 12:16
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Performance issue with FILTER Q
Subject: Re: Performance issue with FILTER QUERY
>
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 05:55 +, Maulin Rathod wrote:
> > SLOW WITH FILTER QUERY (takes more than 1 second)
> >
> >
> > q=+recipient_id:(4042) AND project_id:(332) AND r
Hello,
try to experiment with fq={!cache=false}... or fq={!cache=false cost=100}...
see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Maulin Rathod wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11627427/solr-query-q-or-filter-q
-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: 19 August 2015 12:16
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue with FILTER QUERY
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 05:55 +, Maulin Rathod wrote:
> SLOW WITH FILTER QUERY (takes more than 1 sec
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 05:55 +, Maulin Rathod wrote:
> SLOW WITH FILTER QUERY (takes more than 1 second)
>
>
> q=+recipient_id:(4042) AND project_id:(332) AND resource_id:(13332247
> 13332245 13332243 13332241 13332239) AND entity_type:(2) AND -acti
Hi,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11627427/solr-query-q-or-filter-query-fq
As per above link it suggests to use Filter Query but we observed Filter Query
is slower than Normal Query in our case. Are we doing something wrong?
SLOW WITH FILTER QUERY (takes more than 1 second)
=
