Deepak:
I would strongly urge you to consider changing your problem solution
to _not_ need 35,000 fields. What that usually indicates is that there
are much better ways of tackling the problem. As Shawn says, 35,000
fields won't make much difference for an individual search. But 35,000
fields _do_
On 5/11/2018 9:26 AM, Andy C wrote:
> Why are range searches more efficient than wildcard searches? I guess I
> would have expected that they just provide different mechanism for defining
> the range of unique terms that are of interest, and that the merge
> processing would be identical.
I hope I
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please stop cruelty to Animals, become a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
Make In India : http://
Shawn,
Why are range searches more efficient than wildcard searches? I guess I
would have expected that they just provide different mechanism for defining
the range of unique terms that are of interest, and that the merge
processing would be identical.
Would a search such as:
field:c*
be more e
On 5/10/2018 2:22 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
Are there any benchmarks for this approach? If not, I can give it a spin.
Also wondering if there are any alternative approach (i guess lucene stores
data in a inverted field format)
Here is the only other query I know of that can find documents missing
On Fri, 11 May 2018, 01:15 Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 5/10/2018 11:49 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> > Sorry but I am unclear about - "What if there is no default value and the
> > field does not contain anything"? What does Solr pass on to Lucene? Or is
> > the field itself omitted from the document?
>
On 5/10/2018 11:49 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
Sorry but I am unclear about - "What if there is no default value and the
field does not contain anything"? What does Solr pass on to Lucene? Or is
the field itself omitted from the document?
If there is no default value and the field doesn't exist in w
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please stop cruelty to Animals, become a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
Make In India : http://
On 5/10/2018 10:58 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
I wonder what does Solr stores in the document for fields which are not
being used. And if the queries have a performance difference
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/defining-fields.html
(A default value that will be added automatically to any doc
I wonder what does Solr stores in the document for fields which are not
being used. And if the queries have a performance difference
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/defining-fields.html
(A default value that will be added automatically to any document that does
not have a value in this fie
On 5/10/2018 7:51 AM, Issei Nishigata wrote:
I am designing a schema.
I calculated the number of the necessary field as trial, and found that I
need at least more than 35000.
I do not use all these fields in 1 document.
I use 300 field each document at maximum, and do not use remaining 34700
fie
Hi, all
I am designing a schema.
I calculated the number of the necessary field as trial, and found that I
need at least more than 35000.
I do not use all these fields in 1 document.
I use 300 field each document at maximum, and do not use remaining 34700
fields.
Does this way of using it affec
12 matches
Mail list logo
