frequently for a
period of time, and will not be used afterwards.
I will take your advice to analyze the real queries once the project is in
production.
Thank you very much!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for
. However, I would like to know if this response time is a typical
> "Solr speed" based on 15 M records.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931p4224988.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if this response time is a typical
"Solr speed" based on 15 M records.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931p4224988.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ponse time for the query.
In all the 10 queries I tested (one by one), the response time were
consistently much better with !cache=false.
Does it make sense?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-
