Re: Performance Hit for Zero Record Dataimport

2009-01-21 Thread wojtekpia
Created SOLR 974: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-974 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Hit-for-Zero-Record-Dataimport-tp21572935p21588634.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance Hit for Zero Record Dataimport

2009-01-21 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
r wrote: > > > > I guess Data Import Handler still calls commit even if there were no > > documents created. We can add a short circuit in the code to make sure > > that > > does not happen. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.

Re: Performance Hit for Zero Record Dataimport

2009-01-21 Thread wojtekpia
does not happen. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Hit-for-Zero-Record-Dataimport-tp21572935p21588124.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance Hit for Zero Record Dataimport

2009-01-20 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
ware of the empty update. But since > the performance degradation is the same, I'm guessing that a new Searcher > is > still created, warmed, and registered. Is that correct? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Hit-for-Zero-Record-Dataimport-t

Performance Hit for Zero Record Dataimport

2009-01-20 Thread wojtekpia
ems like something (Lucene?) is aware of the empty update. But since the performance degradation is the same, I'm guessing that a new Searcher is still created, warmed, and registered. Is that correct? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Hit-for-Zero-Reco