Re: Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-28 Thread aurelien . mazoyer
Thank you Erick, Ok, I will probably perform some tests. It seems to be a good candidate for a future blog post... Regards, Aurelien On 27.07.2014 20:20, Erick Erickson wrote: "Does not play nice" really means it was designed to run in a non-distributed mode. There has been no work done to

Re: Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-27 Thread Erick Erickson
"Does not play nice" really means it was designed to run in a non-distributed mode. There has been no work done to verify that it does work in cloud mode, I fully expect some "interesting" problems in that mode. If/when we get to it that is. About replication: I haven't heard of any problems, but

Re: Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-24 Thread Aurélien MAZOYER
Thank you Erick and Alex for your answers. Lots of core stuff seems to meet my requirement but it is a problem if it does not work with Solr Cloud. Is there an issue opened for this problem? If I understand well, the only solution for me is to use multiple monoinstances of Solr using transient c

Re: Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-23 Thread Erick Erickson
Do note that the lots of cores stuff does NOT play nice with in distributed mode (yet). Best, Erick On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Solr has some support for large number of cores, including transient > cores: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores > > Regards,

Re: Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-23 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
Solr has some support for large number of cores, including transient cores: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores Regards, Alex. Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.co

Passivate core in Solr Cloud

2014-07-23 Thread Aurélien MAZOYER
Hello, We want to setup a Solr Cloud cluster in order to handle a high volume of documents with a multi-tenant architecture. The problem is that an application-level isolation for a tenant (using a mutual index with a field "customer") is not enough to fit our requirements. As a result, we ne