Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread Jack Krupansky
large and very large documents (hundreds of fields or large field values.) -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: adfel70 Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:40 AM To: solr-user@.apache Subject: Partial update vs full update performance Hi As I understand, even if I use part

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread adfel70
cannot facet or sort, meaning join queries won't > work for you. > > Upayavira -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-update-vs-full-update-performance-tp4069948p4069981.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 6/12/2013 9:50 AM, adfel70 wrote: > 1. To support partial updates, I must have all the fields stored (most of > which I don't need stored) > Wouldn't I suffer in query perforemnce if I store all these fields? > > 2. Can you elaborate on the large fields issue? > Why does it matter if the field

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 04:54 PM, adfel70 wrote: > Yes it is. > But in my case, these are metadata fields, and I need them to be > searchable, > facetable, sortable in the context of the main text fields. > Will I be able to achieve that if I index them in another core? Unfortunately, at this

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread adfel70
be a >> concern for modest to medium size documents, but clearly would be an >> issue >> for large and very large documents (hundreds of fields or large field >> values.) >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -Original Message- >> From: adfel70 >>

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread adfel70
t to medium size documents, but clearly would be an issue > for large and very large documents (hundreds of fields or large field > values.) > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- > From: adfel70 > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:40 AM > To: > sol

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread Upayavira
arge documents (hundreds of fields or large field > values.) > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- > From: adfel70 > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:40 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Partial update vs full update performance > > Hi > A

Re: Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: adfel70 Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Partial update vs full update performance Hi As I understand, even if I use partial update, lucene can't really update documents. Solr will use the stored fields in order to pas

Partial update vs full update performance

2013-06-12 Thread adfel70
s -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-update-vs-full-update-performance-tp4069948.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.