Great advice Erick, kindly appreciated.
I removed PorterStemFilter as you suggested and it worked as one would
expect it to. Very useful to learn about avoiding KeywordTokenizerFactory,
the limitation of the WhitespaceTokenizer and the testing approach.
Best,
Phil
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:37 PM
First of all, lots of attachments are stripped by the mail server so a number
of your attachments didn’t come through, although your field definitions did so
we can’t see your results.
KeywordTokenizerFactory is something I’d avoid at this point. It doesn’t break
up the input at all, so input o
Hello,
I've had a break-through with my partial string search problem, I don't
understand why though.
I found yet another example,
https://medium.com/aubergine-solutions/partial-string-search-in-apache-solr-4b9200e8e6bb
and this one uses a different tokenizer, whitespaceTokenizerFactory
Hello,
I'm new to Solr and to this user group. Any help with this problem would be
greatly appreciated.
I'm trying to get partial keyword search results working. This seems like a
fairly common problem, I've found numerous google results offering
solutions
for instance
https://stackoverflow.com/qu
hing against
> the special characters in the search.
>
> But the partial search does not work well with “KeywordTokenizerFactory”.
>
>
>
> The partial match results are better in “StandardTokenizerFactory”.
>
>
>
> Field type – text_general
>
>
>
> Example for
HI All,
I am trying to use “KeywordTokenizerFactory” to consider searching against the
special characters in the search.
But the partial search does not work well with “KeywordTokenizerFactory”.
The partial match results are better in “StandardTokenizerFactory”.
Field type
*:*
10
*,score
on
1
Thanks & Best Regards,
Lulu Paul
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2018 18:01
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: query regarding Solr partial se
This is as much about your schema as it is about your query parser usage.
What’s parsed_query say in your debug=true output? What query parser are you
using? If edismax, check qf/pf/mm settings, etc.
Erik
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Paul, Lulu wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> Below is m
Hi ,
Below is my SOLR configuration (schema.xml) for a keyword search field.
· If I search for “Autograph full score”, Solr returns all items that
contains this string in
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. Actually
q="software engineering" - > doc1
q="software engineer" - > no results
q="Software engineer" - > doc2
I hope above test cases will explain my requirements further. So far I'm
thinking of changing the qf according to query has enclosing double
quotations
Lasitha,
I think I understand what you are asking and if you have something like
Doc1 = software engineering
Doc2 = Software engineer
And if you query
q=software+engineer -> Doc1 & Doc2
but
q="software+engineer" -> Doc1
Correct?
If this is correct then to my knowledge no, Solr out of the box
Hi nd,
Here's the issue.. Let's say I search.. Software Engineer. For am example
lets say this query will return 10 results when search against ngram field
. Now I search "Software Engineer" with double quotations. This should
not return same result set as the previous query.
I thought the que
We implemented something similar it sounds to what you are asking but I
dont see why you would need to match the original field. Since technically
a field that has *software engineer* indexed is matched by a query like
"software eng" to "software engineer" with the ngrams; which makes the
exac
Hi All,
I'm trying to implement a search functionality using solr. Currently I'm
suing edismax parser with ngram fields to do the search against. So far it
works well.
The question I have is when the user input double quotations to the search,
As the requirement this should match against the ori
Hi All,
I'm trying to implement a search functionality using solr. Currently I'm
suing edismax parser with ngram fields to do the search against. So far it
works well.
The question I have is when the user input double quotations to the search,
As the requirement this should match against the ori
let's analyse your query requirement :
On 15 October 2015 at 03:08, Brian Narsi wrote:
>
> 1) cardinal healthcare products
> 2) cardinal healthcare
> 3) postoperative cardinal healthcare
> 4) surgical cardinal products
>
>
> q=SellerName:cardinal - all 4 records returned
> q=SellerName:healthca
Thank you Erick. Yes it was the default search field.
So for the following SellerName:
1) cardinal healthcare products
2) cardinal healthcare
3) postoperative cardinal healthcare
4) surgical cardinal products
My requirement is:
q=SellerName:cardinal - all 4 records returned
q=SellerName:healthca
try adding &debug=true to your query. The query
q=SellerName:cardinal he
actually parses as
q=SellerName:cardinal defaultSearchField:he
so I suspect you're getting on the default search field.
I'm not sure EdgeNGram is what you want here though.
That only grams individual tokens, so CARDINAL is g
I have the following fieldtype in my schema:
and the following field:
With the following data:
SellerName:CARDINAL HEALTH
When I do the following search
q:SellerName:cardinal
I get back the results with SellerName: CARDINAL HEALTH (correct)
or I do the search
q:SellerName:
32892/solr-index-time-field-boost
I am using OR condition instead of AND. AND will work for 3 or less but
does not work good more than 3 terms in the search query. I could use
defType=disMax and mm=2 parameters.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-search-t
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mani
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 8:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Partial search
I have three documents with the following search field (text_en type)
values.
When I search for "Energy Field", I am getting
Energy and Peace
Doc2 : Energy One Energy Two Energy Three Energy Four
Doc3 : Mathematic Field Energy Field
What is the best way to configure my search to accomodate as many terms
match as possible?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-search-tp4007097
Since my users wanted to have a partial search functionality I had to
introduce following. I have declared two EdgeNGram filters with both side
"back" and "front" since they wanted to have partial search working from any
side.
When executing search (which
23 matches
Mail list logo
