Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-16 Thread James Bathgate
at the Solr schema version is new enough to recognize >> autoGeneratePhraseQueries. >> 3. What query parser are you using? >> >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -Original Message- From: James Bathgate >> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-11 Thread James Bathgate
Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: James Bathgate > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:26 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Partial Matching in both query and field > > I just noticed I pasted the wrong fieldType with the extra tokenizer not

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-11 Thread Jack Krupansky
PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Partial Matching in both query and field I just noticed I pasted the wrong fieldType with the extra tokenizer not commented out

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-11 Thread James Bathgate
> It looks like it's generating phrases to me even though I have it set to > false. > > James > > > [image: SearchSpring | Findability Unleashed] > > James Bathgate | Sr. Developer > > Toll Free (888) 643-9043 x610 - Fax (719) 358-2027 > > 4291 Austin

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-11 Thread James Bathgate
t; > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: James Bathgate > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:35 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Partial Matching in both query and field > > > Jack, > > I've already tried that, here

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-02 Thread Jack Krupansky
solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Partial Matching in both query and field Jack, I've already tried that, here's my query: on on 0 0_extrafield1_n:20454 OR 10 2.2 Here's the parsed query: 0_extrafield1_n:"2o45 o454 2o454" Here

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-02 Thread James Bathgate
- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: James Bathgate > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:10 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Partial Matching in both query and field > > > Given a string of "123456" and a search query "923459"

Re: Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-02 Thread Jack Krupansky
You will need to set q.op to "OR", and... use a field type that has the autoGeneratePhraseQueries attribute set to "false". -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: James Bathgate Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Part

Partial Matching in both query and field

2013-07-02 Thread James Bathgate
Given a string of "123456" and a search query "923459", what should the schema look like to consider this a match because at least 4 consecutive in characters the query match 4 consecutive characters in the data? I'm trying an NGramFilterFactory on the index and NGramTokenizerFactory on the query i