Seems like your boost field needs to be indexed.
On Jun 12, 2013 3:49 AM, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote:
> I use Nutch to index my documents. I have a Nutch aware schema at my Solr
> and there is a field like that:
>
>
>
> boost holds the epic score of my documents (similar
I use Nutch to index my documents. I have a Nutch aware schema at my Solr
and there is a field like that:
boost holds the epic score of my documents (similar to Google's pagerank).
How can I boost my queries at Solr side?I followed wiki and tried that:
q={!boost b=boost}text:supervillians
Hi,
Please subscribe to the Nutch mailing list. Scoring is straightforward
and calculated scores can be written to the CrawlDB or as external file
field for Solr.
Cheers
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:22:46 -0500 (COT), Manuel Antonio Novoa Proenza
wrote:
hi Rav
Thank you for your answer.
In my
hi Rav
Thank you for your answer.
In my case I use nutch for crawling the web. Using nutch am a true rookie. How
do I configure nutch to return that information? And how do I make solr to
index that information, or that information is being built with the score of
the indexed documents.
thank
his.
>
> In my case, I get data by keyword-matching from Solr and then rank the data
> by PageRank after that.
>
> Thanks,
> Bing
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Manuel Antonio Novoa Proenza <
> mano...@estudiantes.uci.cu> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
&
According to my knowledge, Solr cannot support this.
In my case, I get data by keyword-matching from Solr and then rank the data
by PageRank after that.
Thanks,
Bing
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Manuel Antonio Novoa Proenza <
mano...@estudiantes.uci.cu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I
Hello,
I have in my Solr index , many indexed documents.
Let me know any way or efficient function to calculate the page rank of
websites indexed.
s
10mo. ANIVERSARIO DE LA CREACION DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS CIENCIAS
INFORMATICAS...
CONECTADOS AL FUTURO, CONECTADOS A LA REVOLUCION
http:/
> As I learned, big data, such as Lucene index, was not
> suitable to be
> updated frequently.
Some people use ExternalFileField for PageRank-like fields.
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Solr+Field+Types#SolrFieldTypes-WorkingwithExternalFiles
Lucene supports par
e:
> You can update the document in the index quite frequently. IDNK what
> your requirement is, another option would be to boost query time.
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Bing Li wrote:
> > Dear Shashi,
> >
> > Thanks so much for your reply!
> >
> &
You can update the document in the index quite frequently. IDNK what
your requirement is, another option would be to boost query time.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Bing Li wrote:
> Dear Shashi,
>
> Thanks so much for your reply!
>
> However, I think the value of PageRank is n
Dear Shashi,
Thanks so much for your reply!
However, I think the value of PageRank is not a static one. It must update
on the fly. As I know, Lucene index is not suitable to be updated too
frequently. If so, how to deal with that?
Best regards,
Bing
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Shashi
Lucene has a mechanism to "boost" up/down documents using your custom
ranking algorithm. So if you come up with something like Pagerank
you might do something like doc.SetBoost(myboost), before writing to index.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Bing Li wrote:
> Hi, Kai,
>
>
a?
> >
> > If I want to add new sorting ways, Solr's function query seems to support
> > this feature.
> >
> > However, for a complicated ranking strategy, such PageRank, can Solr
> > provide an interface for me to do that?
> >
> > My ranking ways are mo
>
> However, for a complicated ranking strategy, such PageRank, can Solr
> provide an interface for me to do that?
>
> My ranking ways are more complicated than PageRank. Now I have to load all
> of matched data from Solr first by keyword and rank them again in my ways
> before showing to users. It is correct?
>
> Thanks so much!
> Bing
string field (complete matching), how does Lucene
sort the retrieved data?
If I want to add new sorting ways, Solr's function query seems to support
this feature.
However, for a complicated ranking strategy, such PageRank, can Solr
provide an interface for me to do that?
My ranking ways are
elect?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q={!boost<http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/select?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q=%7B%21boost>b=blogRank
> v=$qq}&qq=title:solr&debugQuery=on'
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Marcus Herou > wrote:
>
>&g
Cool!
GET '
http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/select?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q={!boostb=blogRank
v=$qq}&qq=title:solr&debugQuery=on'
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> That seems wise... PageRank * Text-based Scoring.
>
> So you mean
That seems wise... PageRank * Text-based Scoring.
So you mean in my stupid case that:
GET '
http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/select?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q={!boostb=blogRank
v=$qq}&qq=*:*'
would yield the same results as:
GET
"http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/se
You probably want to mix the custom score with the normal relevancy
score... to add, use a normal boolean query. To multiply, check out
boosted query:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/search/BoostQParserPlugin.html
For other options, use a more complex function query with the new
That is fantastic, I am creating a really small index right now trying to
figure out howto implement the FunctionQuery for this.
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Marcus Herou
> wrote:
> > Great! That seems like something that coul
Works like a charm!
Thank you sir.
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> That is fantastic, I am creating a really small index right now trying to
> figure out howto implement the FunctionQuery for this.
>
> //Marcus
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Yonik Seele
And I published the setup here:
http://dev.tailsweep.com/solr-external-scoring/en/
/M
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Works like a charm!
>
> Thank you sir.
>
> //Marcus
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Marcus Herou > wrote:
>
>> That is fantastic, I am creating a
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Great! That seems like something that could work. Depends on how that field
> get's re-read/indexed I guess.
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.html
It's a separate *text* file that just contains id/va
Hi.
Comments inline.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> How often are you updating the rank?
The goal is to optimize the pagerank calculating algorithm so can have
continuous updates (1 blogs at a time 24/7) but more likely we'll end up
refreshing the inde
On Apr 24, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Marcus Herou wrote:
Hi.
I've posted before but here it goes again:
I have BlogData data which is more or less 100% static but one field
is not
- the PageRank.
I would like to sort on that field and on the Lucene list I got these
answers.
1. Use two ind
Hi.
I've posted before but here it goes again:
I have BlogData data which is more or less 100% static but one field is not
- the PageRank.
I would like to sort on that field and on the Lucene list I got these
answers.
1. Use two indexes and a ParallellReader
2. Use a FieldScoreQuery conta
26 matches
Mail list logo
