t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:49:25 PM
Subject: Re: Overall performance: network v.s. SAN file system
Hi,
I have not done any comparisons with Solr but have done some with
another enterprise search engine. Are you looki
. . . . . .
> Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
>
> - Original Message
> From: Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 6:28:27 PM
> Subject: Overall performance: network v.s.
apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 6:28:27 PM
Subject: Overall performance: network v.s. SAN file system
Is anyone doing Solr installations with a SAN file system? Like IBM
Storage
Tank or Apple XSAN or Red Hat GFS? What are your experiences?
Thanks,
Lance
--
Christopher
riginal Message
From: Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 6:28:27 PM
Subject: Overall performance: network v.s. SAN file system
Is anyone doing Solr installations with a SAN file system? Like IBM
Storage
Tank or Apple XSAN or
Is anyone doing Solr installations with a SAN file system? Like IBM Storage
Tank or Apple XSAN or Red Hat GFS? What are your experiences?
Thanks,
Lance
