Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Arnold Bronley
Thanks, Jan. The issue is created here - https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/289 On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:13 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 < > https://github.com/docker-library/

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Jan Høydahl
I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 Appears that the ‘openjdk’ official docker image is NOT the adoptopenjdk disto, but a RedHat-build binary build of the latest official

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Link to the issue was helpful. : : Although, when I take a look at Dockerfile for any Solr version from here : https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr, the very first line says : FROM openjdk...It : does not say FROM adoptopenjdk. Am I missing something? Ahhh ... I have no idea, But at lea

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Arnold Bronley
version "11.0.4" 2019-07-16 > > > > > : Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:45:36 -0500 > : From: Arnold Bronley > : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > : Subject: Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK > : > : Thank

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
a.vm.version = 11.0.4+11 os.version = 5.0.0-32-generic openjdk version "11.0.4" 2019-07-16 : Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:45:36 -0500 : From: Arnold Bronley : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto O

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Daniel Collins
I would ask your legal team why they want to get away from oracle? Because it’s oracle is not a good enough reason. Because we don’t want to pay support fees is valid but not applicable here, because we don’t want to be tied to a single vendor is valid but questionable here, you can at least chall

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Arnold Bronley
Right, but java.vendor and java.vm.vendor properties are set to Amazon instead of Oracle. So in your previous output how do you know if it is AdoptOpenJDK? On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > Had a thought to test Docker corretto with the same output - the vendor is > still lis

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Kevin Risden
Had a thought to test Docker corretto with the same output - the vendor is still listed as java.specification.vendor = Oracle Corporation docker run --rm -it amazoncorretto:8 java -XshowSettings:properties -version Property settings: awt.toolkit = sun.awt.X11.XToolkit file.encoding = ANSI

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Kevin Risden
Whoops forgot to share the same output from latest. The docker images are clearly building from AdoptOpenJDK so specification vendor is potentially misleading? ➜ ~ docker pull solr Using default tag: latest latest: Pulling from library/solr Digest: sha256:ef1f2241c1aa51746aa3ad05570123eef128d98e9

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Kevin Risden
What specific Solr tag are you using? That looks like JDK 1.8 and an older version. Just picking the current latest as an example: https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/blob/394ead2fa128d90afb072284bce5f1715345c53c/8.4/Dockerfile which uses openjdk:11-stretch and looking up that is https:

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Walter Underwood
Maybe you can give them an estimate of how much work it will be. See if legal will put it on their budget. Free software isn’t free, especially the “free kittens” kind. This guy offers consulting for custom Docker images. https://pythonspeed.com/about/ wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Arnold Bronley
Thanks for the helpful information. It is a no-go because even though it is OpenJDK and free, vendor is Oracle and legal dept. at our company is trying to get away from anything Oracle. It is little paranoid reaction, I agree. See the java.vendor property in following output. $ java -XshowSetting

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Jan Høydahl
Yep, the OpenJDK in Solr image is pure open source, no Oracle license required. If I’m not mistaken it is the AdoptOpenJdk distro under the hoods, which will receive patches for several years unlike Oracles openjdk distro that is only updated for 6 months. For every Solr release we refresh all

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Koen De Groote
Indeed, only Oracle JDK is affected by the commercial license, not OpenJDK, as can be read here: https://www.baeldung.com/oracle-jdk-vs-openjdk Point 5 specifically. Also explained here: https://www.quora.com/Does-using-OpenJDK-provide-a-way-to-be-safe-from-Oracle-Java-Licensing-fee On Fri, Jan

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-31 Thread Erick Erickson
Why is it a no-go? It’s free too. > On Jan 31, 2020, at 12:31 AM, Arnold Bronley wrote: > > Hi, > > I use Solr docker images from https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/. It uses > Oracle OpenJDK. It is a no go for where I work. What is the best way to > replace this JDK with some other OpenJDK such as

Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

2020-01-30 Thread Arnold Bronley
Hi, I use Solr docker images from https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/. It uses Oracle OpenJDK. It is a no go for where I work. What is the best way to replace this JDK with some other OpenJDK such as Amazon Corretto OpenJDK for my docker containers if I still want to use above images?