Have you considered putting them in the _same_ index? There's not much
penalty at all with having sparsely populated fields in a document, so
the fact that the two parts of your index had orthogonal fields
wouldn't cost you much and would solve the synchronization problem.
You can include a type f
Hello,
My team has been working with SOLR for the last 2 years. We have two main
indices:
1. documents
-index and store main text
-one record for each document
2. places (all of the geospatial places found in the documents above)
-index but don't store main text
-
