This sounds interesting... Thanks guyz for the replies.. :)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while back I remember we notices some SPM users were having issues
> with OpenJDK. Since then we've been recommending Oracle's
> implementation to our Solr and to SPM
Hi,
A while back I remember we notices some SPM users were having issues
with OpenJDK. Since then we've been recommending Oracle's
implementation to our Solr and to SPM users. At the same time, we
haven't seen any issues with OpenJDK in the last ~6 months. Oracle
JDK is not slow. :)
Otis
--
So
On 9/30/2013 9:28 AM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
> hmm why is that so?
> Isnt Oracle's version a bit slow?
For Java 6, the Sun JDK is the reference implementation. For Java 7,
OpenJDK is the reference implementation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_implementation
I don't think Oracle's version
hmm why is that so?
Isnt Oracle's version a bit slow?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Bram Van Dam wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 01:11 PM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
>
>> Could someone tell me if OpenJDK or OracleJDK will be best for Apache Solr
>> over CentOS?
>>
>
> If
On 09/30/2013 01:11 PM, Raheel Hasan wrote:
Could someone tell me if OpenJDK or OracleJDK will be best for Apache Solr
over CentOS?
If you're using Java 7 (or 8) then it doesn't matter. If you're using
Java 6, stick with the Oracle version.
Hi guyz,
I am trying to setup a server.
Could someone tell me if OpenJDK or OracleJDK will be best for Apache Solr
over CentOS?
Thanks a lot.
--
Regards,
Raheel Hasan
