Re: Ok, that didn't work

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Tomblin
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I personally think it would be cleaner to allow a post of just a > (or multiple with a surrounding tag), esp now that we can put > modifiers in the URL. Exactly. The action should be in the url. > > For now, just use shell scripting I gue

Re: Ok, that didn't work

2009-10-31 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote: > The add tag isn't part of the document. Yeah, I know... but that's the way the current XML loader expects it. The history is that these were XML commands being posted, rather than XML docs (so one could specify other commands like commit, an

Re: Ok, that didn't work

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Tomblin
The add tag isn't part of the document. Is there a way to feed the actual documents without adding tags that aren't part of the schema to them? On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Hmmm... perhaps you're missing the tag around the ? > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.co

Re: Ok, that didn't work

2009-10-31 Thread Yonik Seeley
Hmmm... perhaps you're missing the tag around the ? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Paul Tomblin wrote: > I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents > to the server. > > Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the docume

Ok, that didn't work

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Tomblin
I was looking at the script in example/exampledocs to feed documents to the server. Just to see if it was possible, I took one of the documents that I've previously indexed using SolrJ, and I tried to feed it directly to the Solr server using the following command: curl http://localhost:8697/solr