Re: Odd interaction between {!tag..} and {!field}

2014-05-20 Thread Erick Erickson
Thanks Chris! The query parsing stuff is something I keep stumbling over, but you may have noticed that! Erick On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : when local params are "embedded" in a query being parsed by the > : LuceneQParser, it applies them using the same scoping

Re: Odd interaction between {!tag..} and {!field}

2014-05-20 Thread Chris Hostetter
: when local params are "embedded" in a query being parsed by the : LuceneQParser, it applies them using the same scoping as other query : operators : : : fq: "{!tag=name_name}{!field f=name}United States" Think of that example in the context of this one -- the basics of when/what

Re: Odd interaction between {!tag..} and {!field}

2014-05-20 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The presence of the {!tag} entry changes the filter query generated by : the {!field...} tag. Note below that in one case the filter query is a : phrase query, and in the other it's parsed with one term against the : specified field and the other against the default field. I think you are missu

Odd interaction between {!tag..} and {!field}

2014-05-20 Thread Erick Erickson
not sure what to make of this... The presence of the {!tag} entry changes the filter query generated by the {!field...} tag. Note below that in one case the filter query is a phrase query, and in the other it's parsed with one term against the specified field and the other against the default fiel