On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed down,
> : and some sort of porting is possible?
> : Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire contents of a Solr index
> : and (re)write it another? (as an
: Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed down,
: and some sort of porting is possible?
: Does anyone know of a tool that can read the entire contents of a Solr index
: and (re)write it another? (as an indexing operation - eg 2.9 -> 3.0.x, so not
: repl)
3.0.2 shoul
> I suppose an index 'remaker' might be something like a DIH reader for
> a Solr index - streams everything out of the existing index, writing
> it into the new one?
This works fine if all fields are stored (and copy field does not go
to a stored field), otherwise you would need/want to start with
>
> Signature Warning
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we all die.
>
> Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
> Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
>
>
> --- On Fri, 9/10/10, peter.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: peter.stu...@gma
e:
> From: peter.stu...@gmail.com
> Subject: No more trunk support for 2.9 indexes
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 8:20 AM
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure there are good reasons for the decision to no
> longer support 2.9 format indexes in 4.0, an
Hi,
I'm sure there are good reasons for the decision to no longer support 2.9
format indexes in 4.0, and not have an automatic upgrade as in previous
versions.
Since Lucene 3.0.2 is 'out there', does this mean the format is nailed
down, and some sort of porting is possible?
Does anyone kn
