Thanks a lot!
I don't know how I missed this discussion.
Thank you again!
Best regards
Atanas
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Aloke Ghoshal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please refer to my response from a few months back:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%3ccaht6
Hi,
Please refer to my response from a few months back:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%3ccaht6s2az_w2av04rdmoeeck5e9o0k4ytktf0pjsecsh-lls...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Our modelling is to index N (individual pages) + 1 (original document) in
Solr. Once a document ha
Thanks for the response. Your suggestion is to keep the existing way of
indexing data where every page of a document is a row in the SOLR database,
changing the "content" field to be store-only and add another field (ex.
document_content) for "index only" where I should put the whole content of
the
Assuming you want both pages to match you need the text to be present on
both pages. Do you actually return/store text of the page in Solr? If so,
you can have that 'page' field store-only and have another field which is
index-only and into which you put all your matching logic. So, that
index-only
So, if the match spans pages 4 and 5, what do you want returned? Page 4,
page 5, or both?
Regards,
Alex
On 28 Aug 2013 06:55, "Атанас Атанасов" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Atanas Atanasov, I'm using SOLR 1.4/3.5/4.3 for an year and a
> half and I'm really satisfied of what it provides. S
