Re: Negative Core Node Numbers

2018-01-05 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/5/2018 1:35 PM, Chris Ulicny wrote: > After more testing, compiling the archived source and the pre-packaged > files on the archive.apache.org site for 7.1.0 keep generating the same > issue with negative core node numbers. > > However, if I compile and run the 7.1 branch from

Re: Negative Core Node Numbers

2018-01-05 Thread Chris Ulicny
After more testing, compiling the archived source and the pre-packaged files on the archive.apache.org site for 7.1.0 keep generating the same issue with negative core node numbers. However, if I compile and run the 7.1 branch from github, it does not produce the negative numbers. When generating

Re: Negative Core Node Numbers

2018-01-04 Thread Chris Ulicny
Thanks Anshum, They don't seem to be consistently numbered on any particular collection creation, but the same numbers will be reused (eventually). After about 3 or 4 tries, I got the same numbered replica on the same machine, so something is being cleared out. The numbers are never consecutive th

Re: Negative Core Node Numbers

2018-01-04 Thread Anshum Gupta
Hi Chris, The core node numbers should be cleared out when the collection is deleted. Is that something you see consistently ? P.S: I just tried creating a collection with 1 shard and 200 replicas and saw the core node numbers as expected. On deleting and recreating the collection, I saw that

Negative Core Node Numbers

2018-01-04 Thread Chris Ulicny
Hi, In 7.1, how does solr determine the numbers that are assigned to the replicas? I'm familiar with the earlier naming conventions from 6.3, but I wanted to know if there was supposed to be any connection between the "_n##" suffix and the number assigned to the "core_node##" name since they don't