As much as possible, use new configs. Take fieldType definitions from
your 4.x example dir, don't use the old ones. e.g. if you use the old
date field type, it won't be usable in various ways (e.g. in the MS()
function).
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> Thanks a
Thanks again Shawn for your comments.
I am little worried about the multi threading of web application which uses
servlets.
I also found one of your explanation (please confirm the same whether its
your comment only) in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Memory-problems-with-HttpSolrServer-td4060
I have done this - upgraded a 1.4 index to 3.x then on to 4.x. It
worked, but...
New field types have been introduced over time that facilitate new
functionality. To continue to use an upgraded index, you need to
continue using the old field types, and thus loose some of the coolness
of newer vers
On 6/26/2013 11:25 PM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> To have singleton design pattern for SolrServer object creation,
> I found that there are so many ways described in
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern
> So which is the best one, out of 5 examples mentioned in above url, for web
> applicat
Thanks Shawn.
To have singleton design pattern for SolrServer object creation,
I found that there are so many ways described in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern
So which is the best one, out of 5 examples mentioned in above url, for web
application in general practice.
I am sure lots
On 6/25/2013 11:52 PM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> Also in application development side,
> as I said that I am going to use HTTPSolrServer API and I found that we
> shouldn't create this object multiple times
> (as per the wiki document http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#HttpSolrServer)
> So I am plannin
think I
> did that once and it worked.
>
> Regards,
> André
>
>
> Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr
think I
> did that once and it worked.
>
> Regards,
> André
>
>
> Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr
ng from scratch before moving on to 4.x - I think I did
that once and it worked.
Regards,
André
Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr ver
bq: I'm not sure if Solr 4.3 will be able to read Solr 1.4 indexes
Solr/Lucene explicitly try to read _one_ major revision backwards.
Solr 3.x should be able to read 1.4 indexes. Solr 4.x should be
able to read Solr 3.x. No attempt is made to allow Solr 4.x to read
Solr 1.4 indexes, so I wouldn't
You must carefully go through the upgrade instructions starting from
1.4 upto 4.3. In particular the instructions for 1.4 to 3.1 and from
3.1 to 4.0 should be given special attention.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are planning to migrate solr 1.4 to So
Hello All,
We are planning to migrate solr 1.4 to Solr 4.3 version.
And I am seeking some help in this side.
Considering Schema file change:
By default there are lots of changes if I compare original Solr 1.4 schema
file to Sol 4.3 schema file.
And that is the reason we are not copying paste of s
12 matches
Mail list logo