...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 4, 2021, at 11:42 AM, ufuk yılmaz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible in any way to get the first value in a multivalued field?
> Using function queries, streaming expressions or any other way without
>
Hi,
Is it possible in any way to get the first value in a multivalued field? Using
function queries, streaming expressions or any other way without reindexing?
(Stream decorators have array(), but no way to get a value at a specific index?)
Another one, is it possible to match a regex to a
Hi,
I am wondering whether there is planning to implement cross collections join
query on multivalued field
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
From the “Common Query Paramters” (sort) section of the ref guide:
"In the case of primitive fields, or SortableTextFields, that are
multiValued="true" the representative value used for each doc when sorting
depends on the sort direction: The minimum value in each document is used for
ascending
I am adding a new float field to my index that I want to perform range
searches and sorting on. It will only contain a single value.
I have an existing dynamic field definition in my schema.xml that I wanted
to use to avoid having to updating the schema:
I went ahead and implemented th
erhead with this?
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
>
> From: Munendra S N
> Sent: 30 October 2020 19:20
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued field
>
> Srinivas,
>
> For atomic updates, you could use add-disti
Thanks Munendra, this will really help me. Are there any performance overhead
with this?
Thanks,
Srinivas
From: Munendra S N
Sent: 30 October 2020 19:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued field
Srinivas,
For atomic updates, you could use
g query time, the field returns only
> unique values? Am I right with my assumption?
> >
> > And also, what is the performance overhead for this UniqueFiled*Factory?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Srinivas
> >
> > From: Dwane Hall
> > Sent: 29 October 2020 1
right with my assumption?
>
> And also, what is the performance overhead for this UniqueFiled*Factory?
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> From: Dwane Hall
> Sent: 29 October 2020 14:33
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued fi
ucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued field
>
> Srinivas this is possible by adding an unique field update processor to the
> update processor chain you are using to perform your updates (/update,
> /update/json, /update/json/docs, .../a_c
,
Srinivas
From: Dwane Hall
Sent: 29 October 2020 14:33
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued field
Srinivas this is possible by adding an unique field update processor to the
update processor chain you are using to perform your updates (/update,
/update
From: Srinivas Kashyap
Sent: Thursday, 29 October 2020 3:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Avoiding duplicate entry for a multivalued field
Hello,
Say, I have a schema field which is multivalued. Is there a way to maintain
distinct values for that field though I continue to add
Hello,
Say, I have a schema field which is multivalued. Is there a way to maintain
distinct values for that field though I continue to add duplicate values
through atomic update via solrj?
Is there some property setting to have only unique values in a multi valued
fields?
Thanks,
Srinivas
___
I forgot how to enter multivalued in Analysis Page in Admin.
Can anyone help?
Jae
Hi,
I'm trying to use Solr query function as a boost for term matches in the
title field. Here's my boost function
bf=if(exists(query({!v='title:Import data'})),10,0)
This throws the following error --> can not use FieldCache on multivalued
field: data
The function s
Hi Doss,
What was existing value and what happens after you do atomic update?
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:47 PM Doss wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have a multiValued field of type String.
>
> multiValued="true"/>
>
> I want to keep this
HI,
I have a multiValued field of type String.
I want to keep this list unique, so I am using atomic updates with
"add-distinct"
{"docid":123456,"namelist":{"add-distinct":["Adam","Jane"]}}
but this is not maintaining the expe
Hello,
I'm trying to parse multivalued field (i.e : [8, 6, 9, 50]) as a List in a
custom function.
I looked all the existing parser here :
(https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search),
and I don't find any example of how to parse a m
Hello,
I'm trying to parse multivalued field (i.e : [8, 6, 9, 50]) as a List in a
custom function.
I looked all the existing parser here :
(https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search),
and I don't find any example of how to parse a m
I found this page.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2135072/determine-which-value-produced-a-hit-in-solr-multivalued-field-type
Hmmm...
2019年7月12日(金) 22:08 Takashi Sasaki :
>
> Hi Solr experts,
>
> I have multivalued location on RPT field.
> Is there a way to know which loca
Hi Solr experts,
I have multivalued location on RPT field.
Is there a way to know which location matched by query?
sample query:
&q=:&fq={!bbox sfield=store}&pt=45.15,-93.85&d=5
Of course I can recalculate on the client side,
but I want to know how to do it using Solr's features.
Solr version i
Hi,
Any hints on this topic?
How to access String / Text values from a multiValued field inside custom
function?
Best regards,
Dariusz Wojtas
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:18 PM Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using SOLR 7.5 in the cloud mode.
> I want to create a custom functio
Hi,
I am using SOLR 7.5 in the cloud mode.
I want to create a custom function similar to 'strdist' that works on
multivalued fields (multiValued=true) and finds the highest matching score.
Yes, I know the potential performance issues, but in my usecase this would
bring a huge benefit.
There is no
G'day,
We're running Solr 5.5.5 to build a search application for a repository of
MS-Office docs and PDFs.
Our schema includes a multivalued field that holds the IDs of objects embedded
in our documents - there can be 100s sometimes 1000s of such objects per
document.
We have a cu
Makes total sense. Thanks to both of your for the clarification!
On 8/18/18, 8:03 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
>Amd part of the issue is that SolrEntityProcessor does not take individual
>field definitions. So that part is ignored and instead just 'fl' mapping
>is
>used as Shawn explained.
Amd part of the issue is that SolrEntityProcessor does not take individual
field definitions. So that part is ignored and instead just 'fl' mapping is
used as Shawn explained.
So you could also remap authorText in that definition to an ignored field.
See
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/
On 8/17/2018 6:15 PM, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
I’m trying to track down an odd issue I’m seeing when using the
SolrEntityProcessor to seed some test data from a solr 4.x cluster to a solr
7.x cluster. It seems like strings are being interpreted as multivalued when
passed from a string field t
Hi,
I’m trying to track down an odd issue I’m seeing when using the
SolrEntityProcessor to seed some test data from a solr 4.x cluster to a solr
7.x cluster. It seems like strings are being interpreted as multivalued when
passed from a string field to a text field via the copyTo directive. Any
Ok, I'll have a look at the link above.
Thanks a lot...
Best
JB
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Ok, I see what I have to look for, thanks to your reply. I'll adjust the
schema and see difference.
Thanks.
Best
JB
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
On 7/2/2018 9:18 AM, jeebix wrote:
> I don't understand why for example "type_cmd_s" get the field type attribute
> "singleValued", but "TTC" or "kits_sans_suite" get "multiValued" attribute ?
> Why those field are in the managed-schema and enseigne_s (for example) is
> not ?
The field named ensei
Because your _s fields must be mapping to the dynamicField definition and
are created accordingly in the schema dynamically without needing a special
definition for each field.
The TTC field you did map explicitly, perhaps with "schemaless" mapping
autodiscovery. Which does create specific field d
Hello everybody,
I have a problem with some field types in the managed-schema generated.
First, the data SOLR returned with a standard query :
response":{"numFound":365567,"start":0,"docs":[
{
"id":"560.561.134676",
"parent_i":560,
"asso_i":561,
"personne_i"
On 6/12/2018 2:56 AM, Marc Lammers wrote:
I want to sort my data by a multivalued field. I add this to my query
„*sort=field(foo,min)
asc“*. The configuration in the schema for this field is
The documentation for the field function says that the field must
contain numeric docvalues. Your
Hi All.
I want to sort my data by a multivalued field. I add this to my query
„*sort=field(foo,min)
asc“*. The configuration in the schema for this field is
The solr documentation says that i have to add the docValues="true"
attribute for this field. After this I deleted the
ould be a duplicated field used only when you wanted to
search by position.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:36 AM, root23 wrote:
> Hi all,
> is there a way i can query a particular index of a multivalued field.
> e.g lets say i have a document like this
> doc 1= {
>
Hi all,
is there a way i can query a particular index of a multivalued field.
e.g lets say i have a document like this
doc 1= {
"id": "1",
"status": [
"b",
"a"
]
}
doc2= {
"id
I have a multivalued field for session timings (where i store timestamps) of
groups document. e.g. session_timings: [1526882026, 1513882026, 1533882026
]. My sorting logic is the groups should be listed sorted based on their
upcoming session time.
For example, Group A has three session_timings
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
>
> Faceting works on multivalued fields, perhaps you can do something with
> that?
>
> The main difference I see in this case between facets and groups is that
groups are sorted by score, so most relevant group comes first.
Which is very use
t;> > Best regards,
>> > Vincenzo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Amrit Sarkar
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Vincenzo,
>> >>
>> >> As I read the source code; Schem
; >> * for a field that may be used to get a FieldCacheSource, throwing
> >> * an appropriate exception (including the field name) if it is not.
> >> * FieldType subclasses can choose to call this method in their
> >> * getValueSource implementation
> >>
e subclasses can choose to call this method in their
>> * getValueSource implementation
>> * @see FieldType#getValueSource
>> */
>> public void checkFieldCacheSource() throws SolrException {
>> if ( multiValued() ) {
>> throw new SolrException(SolrExce
> * @see FieldType#getValueSource
> */
> public void checkFieldCacheSource() throws SolrException {
> if ( multiValued() ) {
> throw new SolrException(SolrException.ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,
> "can not use FieldCache on multivalued field:
t use FieldCache on multivalued field: "
+ getName());
}
if (! hasDocValues() ) {
if ( ! ( indexed() && null != this.type.getUninversionType(this) ) ) {
throw new SolrException(SolrException.ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,
"ca
Hi,
while trying to run a group query on a multivalue field I received this
error:
can not use FieldCache on multivalued field:
true
400
4
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException
can not use FieldCache on multivalued field
affect the score.
Any other way to handle norms in multivalued field?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Sravan Kumar wrote:
> @Walter: Perhaps you are right on not to consider stemming. Instead fuzzy
> search will cover these along with the misspellings.
>
> In case of symbols, we want t
-6 different aliases based on what our source
gives and we do not really know what is the max. Is there no other way from
lucene/solr to use a multivalued field?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I was the first search engineer at Netflix and moved their search fro
;
>>>>>> 3> "Beauty and the Beast", "La bella y la bestia"
>>>>>> 4> "Beauty and the Beast"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: Document 3 has two titles in it.
>>>>>>
>>>>
configuration all
> > >>> the documents receive same score. But 1,3,4 should have got same
> score
> > and
> > >>> document 2 lesser than others.
> > >>>
> > >>> To solve this, we followed what is suggested in the following threa
iValue-fields-td1791651.html
> >>>
> >>> Now, the fields which are used to boost are made to use Norms. And for
> >>> matching norms are disabled. This is to make sure that exact & near
> exact
> >>> matches are rewarded.
> >>>
> >>> But, for the same query, we get the following results.
> >>> query: "Beauty & the Beast"
> >>> Search Results:
> >>> 1> "Beauty and the Beast"
> >>> 4> "Beauty and the Beast"
> >>> 2> "The Real Beauty and the Beast"
> >>> 3> "Beauty and the Beast", "La bella y la bestia"
> >>>
> >>> Clearly, the changes have solved only a part of the problem. The
> document 3
> >>> should be ranked/scored higher than document 2.
> >>>
> >>> This is because lucene considers the total field length across all the
> >>> values in a multivalued field for normalization.
> >>>
> >>> How do we handle this scenario and make sure that in multivalued
> fields the
> >>> normalization is taken care of?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Sravan
> >>
>
luencing-scores-on-values-in-multiValue-fields-td1791651.html
>>>
>>> Now, the fields which are used to boost are made to use Norms. And for
>>> matching norms are disabled. This is to make sure that exact & near exact
>>> matches are rewarded.
>>>
near exact
>> matches are rewarded.
>>
>> But, for the same query, we get the following results.
>> query: "Beauty & the Beast"
>> Search Results:
>> 1> "Beauty and the Beast"
>> 4> "Beauty and the Beast"
>> 2>
gt; But, for the same query, we get the following results.
> query: "Beauty & the Beast"
> Search Results:
> 1> "Beauty and the Beast"
> 4> "Beauty and the Beast"
> 2> "The Real Beauty and the Beast"
> 3> "Bea
ry: "Beauty & the Beast"
Search Results:
1> "Beauty and the Beast"
4> "Beauty and the Beast"
2> "The Real Beauty and the Beast"
3> "Beauty and the Beast", "La bella y la bestia"
Clearly, the changes have solved only a
I´am sorry, everything is working fine!
2018-01-23 16:44 GMT-02:00 Kojo :
> I am trying to solve one problem, exactly as the case described here:
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Streaming-expression-API-innerJoin-on-
> multi-valued-field-td4353794.html
>
> I cannot accomplish that on Solr
I am trying to solve one problem, exactly as the case described here:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Streaming-expression-API-innerJoin-on-multi-valued-field-td4353794.html
I cannot accomplish that on Solr 6.6, my streaming expression returns
nothing:
hashJoin(
search(scholarship, zkHost=
Shacky
Quote "A multivalued field is useful when there are more than one value present
for the field. An easy example would be tags, there can be multiple tags that
need to be indexed...". So yes, you are on the right track. Cheers -- Rick
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5800762/w
Hi,
I need to create a new collection on my Solr 6.1.0 cluster where every row
is a "content" and every content can belong to one or many categories,
which are specified in a multivalued field "categories".
In my web app the user can search by categories, and if wanted it ca
So I have a field named "key" that uses KeywordTokenizer and has
multiValued="true" set. A doc like
val one
yet another value
third
My field will have exactly three indexed tokens
val one
yet another value
third
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> I don't
I don't understand the first option, what is each value? Keyword tokenizer
emits single token, analogous to string type.
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017, 7:45:52 PM GMT+3, Walter Underwood
wrote:
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of v
Hi Wunder,
I think it's the first option: if you have 3 values then the analyzer
chain is executed three times.
Andrea
On 12/04/17 18:45, Walter Underwood wrote:
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of values and make that a single st
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of values and make that a single string?
I really hope it is the former. I can’t find this in the docs (including
JavaDocs).
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.or
Hi All,
I have a multivalued date field i.e.:
[2017-02-06T00:00:00Z,2017-02-09T00:00:00Z,2017-03-04T00:00:00Z]
I want to count how many dates exist given a data range within such field.
i.e.
start: 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z
end: 2017-02-28T00:00:00Z
result is 2 (2017-02-06T00:00:00Z and 2017-02-09T
hi sorry if this a little bit out ouf topic,
i've just started to using banana dashboard. and i want to do summarize
proccess from data that indexed in solr
can i do sum proccess with banana dashboard when i have some multivalued
data index on my field?
this is my sample data on solr :
"ti
Yes, so the terms component will of course show me the same thing as the facet
query, I am sure the facet query is not wrong. It shows ` in the values, no
matter for which unique product key since there should be 0 of them since there
is a splitby, was there something else you wanted me to look
"should" is the operative term here. My guess is that the data you're putting
in the index isn't what you think it is.
I'd suggest you use the TermsComponent to examine the data actually in
your index.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Sales
wrote:
> We are using Solr 4.10.4. I have a
We are using Solr 4.10.4. I have a few Solr fields in schema.xml defined as
follows:
Both of them are loaded in via data-config.xml import handler, and they are
defined there as:
This has been working for years, but, lately, we have noticed strange
Thanks for the reply! We did it this way and it's seems to turn out really
well
On 6 February 2017 at 22:57, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> Correct: multivalued field with 1 shop IDs. Use case: shopping network
> in U.S. for example for a big brand such as Walmart, when user implicitly
&g
Correct: multivalued field with 1 shop IDs. Use case: shopping network
in U.S. for example for a big brand such as Walmart, when user implicitly
provides IP address or explicitly Postal Code, so that we can find items in
his/her neighbourhood.
You basically provide “join” information via
hop should always be boosted heavily
TLDR:
Either we just have a multiValued field on the item document with all
shops. This would be a multivalued field with 1 rows
Or
Could we have a new document ShopItem that has the shopId and the itemId
(think join table). Then we join this docume
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 de dezembro de 2016 16:10
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: matching string to multivalued field
Why are you trying to do this? I'm wondering if this is an XY problem.
For instance, you could use a multivalued field of _text_ type with a
positinIncrementGap of 100. No
Why are you trying to do this? I'm wondering if this is an XY problem.
For instance, you could use a multivalued field of _text_ type with
a positinIncrementGap of 100. Now you simply search (don't need
function queries) for "Deli NCR"~90 and you wouldn't match
across mu
Greetings all,
I am trying to match a user input string with a multivalued field in solr.
For non multivalued fields I was using following function query
strdist(def(state_exact,""),"Delhi NCR",edit)
Using the same for multivalued fields throws following error
"
I think you can use the term stats that Lucene tracks for each field.
Compare Terms.getSumTotalTermFreq and Terms.getDocCount. If they are
equal it means every document that had this field, had only one token.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Mik
I suppose it's needless to remind that norm(field) is proportional (but not
precisely by default) to number of tokens in a doc's field (although not
actual text values).
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Say I indexed a large dataset against a schemaless
I don't think so. Once things are indexed, they look just like a
regular text field with odd offsets for some of the terms. Of course
if you returned the stored form (assuming it's stored) it'd look
different, but that's messy too.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitc
Hello,
Say I indexed a large dataset against a schemaless configuration. Now
I have a bunch of multivalued fields. Is there any way to say which of
these (text) fields have (for given data) only single values? I know I
am supposed to look at the original data, and all that, but this is
more for de
Hello,
I'm having a result set something like this, and query like below. The facet
count for Line field is 1(1). That is, value Line's value 1 has numBucket = 1.
However, I need to count the number of occurrence of each of the values in the
LINE field. Is there a way to do this?
Expecting som
al and paid_source - Alice should be able to
> see this document, but Bob should not.
>
> So if I am creating a query for Bob, how can I write it so that he can't see
> Document 1? I.e. how do I create a query that checks the multiValued field
> for 'confidential'
First answer "what does sorting on a field with more than one value
mean?" Say I have
"aardvark" and "zebra". Where should the doc go, at the beginning or
end of the list?
For numerics at least you can do this, see:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/09/10/minmax-on-
Hi,
We are using solr 5.2.0. We have requirement to sort dynamic fields which
contains multivalued = true.Can any one guide me how we can achieve it?If newer
version of solr supports it we are ok to upgrade solr.
Regards,Harsh
fidential and paid_source - Alice should be able to see
this document, but Bob should not.
So if I am creating a query for Bob, how can I write it so that he can't see
Document 1? I.e. how do I create a query that checks the multiValued field for
'confidential' but excludes
Thanks! That's very helpful!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-JIRA-changed-the-stored-order-of-multivalued-field-tp4264325p4271312.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: We do POST to add data to Solr v4.7 and Solr v5.3.2 respectively. The
: attachmentnames are in 789, 456, 123 sequence:
...
: And we do GET to select data from solr v4.7 and solr v5.3.2 respectively:
: http://host:port/solr/collection1/select?q=id:1&wt=json&indent=true
...
: Is
t;456",
"789"],*/
"_version_":1529020749012008960}]
}}
solr v5.3.2 response:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":37,
"params":{
"q":"id:1",
"indent":"true",
"wt":"json"}},
"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
{
"id":"1",
"subject_store":"111",
"owner":"1",
"sequence":1,
"unid":"1",
"customerid":"1",
"servername":"1",
"noteid":"1",
/*"attachmentnames":["789",
"456",
"123"]*/,
"_version_":1529046229145616384}]
}}
Is there any JIRA fixed making this order changed? Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-JIRA-changed-the-stored-order-of-multivalued-field-tp4264325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bq: which of those date values will be used for faceting when I
use range-search faceting on this field?
All of them. Which values match in a multiValued field, range
query or not, have no bearing on the facet counts. Faceting
essentially says "take all the docs that match the query and,
for
My apology for not being clear -- I left out the keyword "range search"
with facet. Let me try again.
Using DateRangeField field type, if this field is multiValued and I have 3
date values stored for one record, 5 for another, etc., which of those date
values will be used for faceting when I use
Yes.
What do you mean "how does it work"? The low-level
details or what?
Basically, faceting just... facets. I.e. for each unique
value in the field specified it counts the number of
docs in the result set that have that value.
So if you have a doc with two dates and facet on that
field, say 1/1
Hi everyone,
Can I use facet on a field type of multiValued? If so, how does facet work
with field type of "date" set as multiValued?
Thanks
Steve
*updated subject line
Hi,
I have been facing a weird issue in solr.
I am working on Solr 4.10.3 on Cloudera CDH 5.4.4 and am trying to group
results on a multivalued field, let's say "interests".
This is giving me an error message below:
"error": {
"ms
Thanks Joel.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-export-handler-is-exporting-only-unique-values-from-multivalued-field-tp4249986p4250067.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
riority for me and I am stuck , please can someone help.
>>
>> I am using solr 5.2
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alok
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-export-handler-is-exporting-only-unique-values-from-multivalued-field-tp4249986.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-export-handler-is-exporting-only-unique-values-from-multivalued-field-tp4249986.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
,item2
This is priority for me and I am stuck , please can someone help.
I am using solr 5.2
Thanks,
Alok
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-export-handler-is-exporting-only-unique-values-from-multivalued-field-tp4249986.html
Sent from the Solr - User
ork, be sure to provide detail of what the symptom
is rather than simply saying that it doesn't work.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, marotosg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add a new field to my schema to add the number of items of a
> multivalued field.
&g
count = array_count($array);
>
>
>
> On 6 January 2016 at 08:43, marotosg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to add a new field to my schema to add the number of items
> of a
> > multivalued field.
> > I am using solr 4.11
> >
of items of a
> multivalued field.
> I am using solr 4.11
>
> These are my fields on *schema.xml*
> multiValued="true" stored="true" />
>
>
> Here is the update done to my *solrconfig.xml*. I created an
> upd
Hi,
I am trying to add a new field to my schema to add the number of items of a
multivalued field.
I am using solr 4.11
These are my fields on *schema.xml*
Here is the update done to my *solrconfig.xml*. I created an
updateRequestProcessorChain
and add it to the update handler
ecember 18, 2015 2:27 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Permutations of entries in a multivalued field
The other thing to check is the ComplexPhraseQueryParser, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser
It uses the Span queries to build up
Duh, didn't realize you could set inOrder in Solr. Y, that's the better
solution.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 2:27 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Permutations of entries in a multivalued field
1 - 100 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
