Re: Java - setting multi-valued fields

t; > > > > -Original Message- > From: kumar gaurav > Sent: onsdag 17. juni 2020 19:02 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Java - setting multi-valued fields > > HI > > Example: > > String[] values = new String[] {“value 1”, “va

RE: Java - setting multi-valued fields

- From: kumar gaurav Sent: onsdag 17. juni 2020 19:02 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Java - setting multi-valued fields HI Example: String[] values = new String[] {“value 1”, “value 2” }; inputDoc.setField (multiFieldName, values); Can you try once to change the array to list

Re: Java - setting multi-valued fields

HI Example: String[] values = new String[] {“value 1”, “value 2” }; inputDoc.setField (multiFieldName, values); Can you try once to change the array to list ? List values = new ArrayList<>(); values.add("value 1"); values.add("value 2"); inputDoc.setField (multiFieldName, values); regar

Java - setting multi-valued fields

Hi, My customer has a Solr index with a large amount of fields, many of these are multivalued (type="string", multiValued="true"). I am having problems with setting the values for these fields in my Java update processors. Example: String[] values = new String[] {"value 1", "value 2" }; inputDo

Re: Solr 7.5 multi-valued fields will not update with multiple values

Separate out the author bits. Instead of "author_fullname":["Author 1","Author 2”,”Author 3”] use "author_fullname":"Author 1”, "author_fullname":"Author 2”, "author_fullname":”Author 3” > On Mar 29, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Eivind Hodneland > wrote: > > curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/j

Solr 7.5 multi-valued fields will not update with multiple values

Hi, I am running a Solr 7.5 index for a customer. I have recently discovered that none of the multivalued string/text fields are filled with more than one value each. Example of indexing (edited and abbreviated): curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' 'http://localhost:18080/solr/cust

Re: Sorting multi-valued fields

On 9/14/2018 4:50 AM, richard.clarke wrote: What does it mean to sort documents by a multivalued field? If a field has multiple values, how can this be used to sort documents? e.g. if document 1 has a numeric field containing values 1,2,3,4,5 and document 2 has values in the same field of 1,2,3

Re: Sorting multi-valued fields

http://people.apache.org/~mkhl/searchable-solr-guide-7-3/common-query-parameters.html#sort-parameter In the case of primitive fields, or SortableTextFields, that are multiValued="true" the representative value used for each doc when sorting depends on the sort direction: The minimum value in each d

Sorting multi-valued fields

Hi What does it mean to sort documents by a multivalued field? If a field has multiple values, how can this be used to sort documents? e.g. if document 1 has a numeric field containing values 1,2,3,4,5 and document 2 has values in the same field of 1,2,3 - which come first in the sort order and w

Reading multi-valued fields in a Function Query

Hi, I'm trying to write a function query that needs to stick a score [0..1] to each doc in the search results based on some logic applied to a multi-valued field in the document. This is an excerpt of the schema: And this is how it looks in a generic document on the index: "sku_store": [

JSON Facet on Multi-Valued fields

Hi, Would like to check, is it possible to do JSON Facet on Multi-Valued fields? I tried to do it, and I get the following error: "error":{ "metadata":[ "error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException", "root-error-class"

Re: facet on two multi-valued fields

> Hi, > > sorry, the subject may have been misleading. I want to get facet results for > only one field (tagIds) but restrict the returned values to those with a > matching tagDescription. Both multi-valued fields have the same order. > > Example docs > &g

Re: facet on two multi-valued fields

Hi, sorry, the subject may have been misleading. I want to get facet results for only one field (tagIds) but restrict the returned values to those with a matching tagDescription. Both multi-valued fields have the same order. Example docs id:"1" tagIds:["10","

Re: facet on two multi-valued fields

It makes no sense to facet on a “text_general” ananlyzed field. Can you give a concrete example with a few dummy docs and show some queries (do you query the tagDescription field?) and wanted facet output? There may be several ways to solve the task, depending on the exact use case. One solutio

facet on two multi-valued fields

Hi, my schema looks like this multiValued="true"/> stored="false" multiValued="true"/> I'd like to get the tagIds of documents with a certain tagDescription (and text). However tagIds contains multiple ids in the same order as tagDescription and simple faceting would return all. Is there a

faceting on correlated multi-valued fields?

Hi, I'm thinking about indexing articles with tags in a denormalized way as follows multiValued="true"/> stored="false" multiValued="true"/> An article can have multiple tags. Each tag has a description and an ID. The multi-valued fields tagIds

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

That's excellent Mikhail ! Thanks so much. I have to use it in my custom query parser now. Ludovic. - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4160668.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, lboutros wrote: > What do you think about developing a new SpanQuery class that allows "cross > field" queries ? > indeed http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_0_3/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/FieldMaskingSpanQuery.html -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

t; I can now play with position increments and slops to get "exact" results > within two multi valued fields. > > And for the 1st proposal, my user queries can be bigger than 10k with lots > of different blocks and operators ;) > > Now I have to use this query in my custom

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

I 've just finished a first implementation of a CrossFieldSpanNearQuery and it just works perfectly :D I can now play with position increments and slops to get "exact" results within two multi valued fields. And for the 1st proposal, my user queries can be bigger than 10k with lo

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

> Ludovic > > > > > - > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159883.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

proposal : What do you think about developing a new SpanQuery class that allows "cross field" queries ? Ludovic - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159883.html Sent from the Solr - User ma

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

event contains 4 fields with 3 different analyzers. > > We need more than just filtering on them (highlighting on documents and > events at the same time for instance). > That means that nested documents cannot be used. > > These events are indexed as additional multi valued fields in

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

means that nested documents cannot be used. These events are indexed as additional multi valued fields in each documents. They are searched like any other field. The issue here is that the operator 'AND' between event fields can match false positives. We do not know the position during

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

alue with 1st value (like positional >> constraints?). > > That's exactly what I would like to do. :) > > > > > - > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp41597

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote > Are you saying you want to match 1st value with 1st value (like positional > constraints?). That's exactly what I would like to do. :) - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-va

Re: AND operator in multi valued fields

ay to do that ? > > Ludovic. > > > > - > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AND operator in multi valued fields

Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields?

27;t quite follow the last point. -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields? Hi, Instead of the mul

Re: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields?

Hi, Instead of the multi-valued fields, would parent-child setup for you here? See http://search-lucene.com/?q=solr+join&fc_type=wiki Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:04 PM, David Parks wrote: > The documents are individu

RE: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields?

18, 2013 2:32 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields? David, What's the documents and the field? It can help to suggest workaround. On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:51 PM, David Parks wrote: > I want to configure Field Collapsing, but m

Re: Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields?

ocument, > 1-N entries). > > I read on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing) that > grouping doesn't support multi-valued fields yet. > > Anything in the works on that front by chance? Any common work-arounds? > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khl

Field Collapsing - Anything in the works for multi-valued fields?

I want to configure Field Collapsing, but my target field is multi-valued (e.g. the field I want to group on has a variable # of entries per document, 1-N entries). I read on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing) that grouping doesn't support multi-valued fields yet. Anythi

Re: Solr 3.6 issue - DataImportHandler with CachedSqlEntityProcessor not importing all multi-valued fields

ot; is much faster than > processor="SqlEntityProcessor", the resulting Solr index does not contain > multi-valued fields on sub-entities. > > So, for example, my db-data-config.xml has the following structure: > > > .. > > proc

Solr 3.6 issue - DataImportHandler with CachedSqlEntityProcessor not importing all multi-valued fields

"SqlEntityProcessor", the resulting Solr index does not contain multi-valued fields on sub-entities. So, for example, my db-data-con

Re: How to expand list into multi-valued fields?

ke to transform these values into multi-valued fields in SOLR's index. For example, ColumnA (From RDBMS) - apple|orange|banana I want to expand this to, SOLR Index FruitField=apple FruitField=orange FruitField=banana or number

How to expand list into multi-valued fields?

I am indexing content from a RDBMS. I have a column in a table with pipe separated values, and upon indexing I would like to transform these values into multi-valued fields in SOLR's index. For example, ColumnA (From RDBMS) - apple|orange|banana I want to e

Re: frange with multi-valued fields

: Has anyone had experience using frange with multi-valued fields? In : solr 3.5 doing so results in the error: "can not use FieldCache on : multivalued field" correct. : Here's the use case. We have multiple years attached to each document : and want to be able to refine

frange with multi-valued fields

Has anyone had experience using frange with multi-valued fields? In solr 3.5 doing so results in the error: "can not use FieldCache on multivalued field" Here's the use case. We have multiple years attached to each document and want to be able to refine by a year range.

Re: Multi-word searches in multi-valued fields

ttp://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message - > From: "Olson, Ron" > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:49 AM > Subject: Multi-word searches in multi-valued fields > > Hi all- > > I'm not c

Multi-word searches in multi-valued fields

Hi all- I'm not clear on how to allow a user to search a multi-valued field with multiple words and return only those documents where all the words are together in one value, and not spread over multiple values. If I do a literal search on the "company name" field for "smith trucking" (with th

Re: unique terms and multi-valued fields

to figure out how much my index size might grow. These fields I am dealing > with are large and repetitive (but mixed). > > > > From: Erick Erickson > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Kevin Osborn > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:08 AM > Su

Re: unique terms and multi-valued fields

Osborn Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:08 AM Subject: Re: unique terms and multi-valued fields Well, it depends (tm). If you're talking about *indexed* terms, then the value is stored only once in both the cases you mentioned below. There's really very little difference between a non-mu

Re: unique terms and multi-valued fields

f my > documents, it is really only stored on disk once because "category:computers" > is a unique term. Is this correct? > > But, what about multi-valued fields. So, I have a field called "category". > For 100 documents, it has the values "computers"

unique terms and multi-valued fields

Please verify my understanding. I have a field called "category" and it has a value "computers". If I use this same field and value for all of my documents, it is really only stored on disk once because "category:computers" is a unique term. Is this correct? But,

Re: PositionIncrement gap and multi-valued fields.

Hi Luis, As far as i know, the position increment gap only affects in some queries, like phrase queries if you use the slop. The position incremente gap does not affect the similarity scoring formula of lucene : score(q,d) = coord(q,d)

PositionIncrement gap and multi-valued fields.

Hello! I have a doubt about the behaviour of searching over field types that have positionIncrementGap defined. For example, supose that: 1. We have a field called "test" defined as multi-valued and white space tokenized. 2. The index has an single document with a "test" value: TEST1

Re: Joining on multi valued fields

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, wrote: > Hi Yonik > > So I tested the join using the sample data below and the latest trunk. I > still got the same behaviour. > > HOWEVER! In this case it was nothing to do with the patch or solr version. It > was the tokeniser splitting G1 into G and 1. Ah, g

RE: Joining on multi valued fields

ugust 2011 15:04 To: yo...@lucidimagination.com Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Joining on multi valued fields No I haven't. I will get the latest out of the trunk and report back. Cheers again, Matt -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com]

RE: Joining on multi valued fields

bject: Re: Joining on multi valued fields Hmmm, if these are real responses from a solr server "at rest" (i.e. documents not being changed between queries) then what you show definitely looks like a bug. That's interesting, since TestJoin implements a random test that should cover ca

Re: Joining on multi valued fields

t;  AN >  B125 >  B126 >  B130 >  BL63 >  G41 >  GK >  MZ >   >   >   >   > > So as you can see I get back 3 results when only 2 match the criteria. > i.e. docs where G1 is present in multi valued "code" field. Why should > the last document be incl

RE: Joining on multi valued fields

From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: 01 August 2011 18:28 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Joining on multi valued fields On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, wrote: > I have been using the JOIN patch > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

Re: Joining on multi valued fields

field. That should work (and the unit tests do test with multi-valued fields). Can you come up with a simple example where you are not getting the expected results? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com

Joining on multi valued fields

to join on multi-valued fields? Thanks, Matt This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.

Re: StatsComponent and multi-valued fields

I'm not sure ... just reading it yesterday night ... but isn't the unapplied patch from Harish https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12400054/SOLR-680.patch what you want? Regards, Peter. > Running 1.4.1. > > I'm able to execute stats queries against multi

Re: StatsComponent and multi-valued fields

: I'm able to execute stats queries against multi-valued fields, but when : given a facet, the statscomponent only considers documents that have a facet : value as the last value in the field. : : As an example, imagine you are running stats on "fooCount", and you want to : facet

StatsComponent and multi-valued fields

Running 1.4.1. I'm able to execute stats queries against multi-valued fields, but when given a facet, the statscomponent only considers documents that have a facet value as the last value in the field. As an example, imagine you are running stats on "fooCount", and you want t

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

: The other would be to somehow control the scores of each id. So a document : with 2 ids matching should be worth more then the document with only 1 id : matching (This is how it works now) but a document with 7 ids matching : shouldn't be worth more, or at least not a lot more, then a document t

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

.com/Scoring-on-multi-valued-fields-tp1017624p1020504.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:16 PM, oleg.gnatovskiy wrote: > > Sorry guess I messed up my example query. The query should look like this: > > name:pizza AND id:(10 OR 20 OR 30) > > Thus if I do name:pizza^10 AND id:(10 OR 20 OR 30)^0 wouldn't a document > that has all the ids (10,20, and 30) still com

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Scoring-on-multi-valued-fields-tp1017624p1020234.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, oleg.gnatovskiy wrote: > > Oh sorry guys, I didn't correctly submit my original post to the mailing > list. The original message was this: > " > Hello all. We are having some trouble with queries similar to the type shown > below: > > name: pizza OR (id:10 OR id:20

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

in advance for any assistance you might be able to offer. " -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Scoring-on-multi-valued-fields-tp1017624p1020181.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Scoring on multi-valued fields

I checked the explain query. What happens is that the sums of all the hits on ID are added up. Is there a way to only grab the first score? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Scoring-on-multi-valued-fields-tp1017624p1020150.html Sent from the Solr

Re: Multi valued fields

: Can I build a query such as : : : -field: A : : which will return all documents that do not have "exclusive" A in the : their field's values. By exclusive I mean that I don't want documents : that only have A in their list of values. In my sample case, the query : would return doc A

Re: Multi valued fields

This could be done with a function query, except that the function I would use does not exist. There is no function that returns the number of values that exist for a field. If there were, you could say: -field:A OR (field:A and function() > 1) I don't know the Lucene data structures well, but I

Multi valued fields

Hi All, I'd like to know if it is possible to do the following on a multi-value field: Given the following data: document A: field1 = [ A B C D] document B: field 1 = [A B] document C: field 1 = [A] Can I build a query such as : -field: A which will return all documents that d

Re: How can I get Solr-Cell to extract to multi-valued fields?

It is a bug. I just filed this. It is just a unit test that displays the behavior. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1803 On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Hi, > > I have a schema with a multivalued field like so: > > multiValued="true"/> > > I am uploading html docu

How can I get Solr-Cell to extract to multi-valued fields?

Hi, I have a schema with a multivalued field like so: I am uploading html documents to the Solr extraction handler which contain meta in the head, like so: I want the extraction handler to map each of these pieces of meta onto the product field, however, there seems to be a problem - onl

Re: complex multi valued fields

product > name. > > One option I see is to have a line item multi value field and when > producing > the document to pass to Solr, concat the quantity and desc and put it in > the multi > value field. > > My preference would be the ability to define such complex multi valued >

complex multi valued fields

producing the document to pass to Solr, concat the quantity and desc and put it in the multi value field. My preference would be the ability to define such complex multi valued fields out of the box. Is that supported in a Solr 1.4 environment? Basically a field type that allows you to define the

Re: faceting/searching on multi-valued fields

ued fields. Something like: > > RAM: > 50 GB (5) > 40 GB (2) > > Brand: > XX (10) > VS (1) > > color: > red (9) > blue (2) > > Is there a way to create this kind of faceting over multi-valued fields? > > And about querying multi-valued fie

faceting/searching on multi-valued fields

-valued fields? And about querying multi-valued fields: Lets say I want to get blue coloured documents, The query '+key:color +value:blue' would return those two docs: blue ... color ... red blue ... color

RE: Boosting ('bq') on multi-valued fields

> Hey Ken, > Thanks for your reply. > When I wrote '5|6' I ment that this is a multiValued field with two > values > '5' and '6', rather than the literal string '5|6' (and any Tokenizer). > Does > your reply still holds? That is, are multiValued fields dependent on > the > notion of tokenization t

RE: Boosting ('bq') on multi-valued fields

t; > There is no tokenization on 'string' fields, so a query for "5" does not > match a doc with a value of "5|6" for this field. You could try using > field type 'text' for this and see what you get. You may need to > customize it to you the St

RE: Boosting ('bq') on multi-valued fields

> Hey, > I have a field defined as such: > > stored="false" > multiValued="true" /> > > with the string type defined as: > > omitNorms="true"/> > > When I try using some query-time boost parameters using the bq on > values of > this field it seems to behave > strangely in case of documents actua

Boosting ('bq') on multi-valued fields

'm using a nightly solr build from a few months back.. ) Thanks, -Chak -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-%28%27bq%27%29-on-multi-valued-fields-tp24713905p24713905.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Multi-valued fields with DIH

gt;> >> 0:0:0.142 >> --- row #1----- >> MySource/Area/Admin >> MySource/Version/06.02 >> 2008-10-21T07:00:00Z >> ..... >> >> == >> >> But the resulting index has no data in the field 'projects'. Is i

Re: Multi-valued fields with DIH

== > > > - > > - > > + > > x > > 0:0:0.142 > --- row #1- > MySource/Area/Admin > MySource/Version/06.02 > 2008-10-21T07:00:00Z > . > > == > > But the resulting ind

Multi-valued fields with DIH

ut the resulting index has no data in the field 'projects'. Is it NOT possible to create multi-valued fields with DIH? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-valued-fields-with-DIH-tp22877509p22877509.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

: I am trying to do facet search on 3 fields (all multivalued fields) in one : query. field1 has 2 million distinct values, field2 has 1.5 million distinct : values, field3 has 50,000 distinct values. : : I already set the filterCache to 3,000,000, But the searching speed is still making your fi

Re: Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

still > >> > very slow. Normally each query will took 5 mins or more. As I narrow > >> down > >> > the search, the speed will increase dramatically. > >> > > >> > Is there anyway to optimize the faceted search? Every help is > >> > appreciat

Re: Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

slow. Normally each query will took 5 mins or more. As I narrow >> down >> > the search, the speed will increase dramatically. >> > >> > Is there anyway to optimize the faceted search? Every help is >> > appreciated. >> > Thanks in advanced. &g

Re: Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

t; Thanks in advanced. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > GC > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Facet-search-on-Multi-Valued-Fields-tp22053260p22053578.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Re: Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

; > Is there anyway to optimize the faceted search? Every help is > appreciated. > Thanks in advanced. > > > > Regards > > GC > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Facet-search-on-Multi-Valued-Fields-tp22053260p22053578.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Facet search on Multi-Valued Fields

Hi all, I have been experimenting solr faceted search for 2 weeks. But I meet performance limitation on facet Search. My solr contains 4,000,000 documents. Normal searching is fairly fast, But faceted search is extremely slow. I am trying to do facet search on 3 fields (all multivalued fields) in

Re: Different XML format for multi-valued fields?

his difference? Also, how does faceting work with : multi-valued fields? It seems that I sometimes get facet results from : multi-valued fields, and sometimes I don't. i'm not sure i understand what exactly your question is ... you need to give us more info to go on (ie: what the and l

Re: Different XML format for multi-valued fields?

s there a reason for this difference? Also, how does faceting work with > multi-valued fields? It seems that I sometimes get facet results from > multi-valued fields, and sometimes I don't. > > Thanks. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Different-X

Different XML format for multi-valued fields?

2 Is there a reason for this difference? Also, how does faceting work with multi-valued fields? It seems that I sometimes get facet results from multi-valued fields, and sometimes I don't. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Different-XML-format-for-m

Re: Bizarre DisMax behavior: "q" parameter not working but "q.alt" is, and multi-valued fields not matching at all

: I would: : - enter the problematic query on the Solr Admin Analysis page and make sure all is sane there : - use &debugQuery=true and see how your query is rewritten Also look at the explanation output -- even if no docs are being returned you can use explainOther to see *why* something isn't

Re: Bizarre DisMax behavior: "q" parameter not working but "q.alt" is, and multi-valued fields not matching at all

l Message > From: Ezra Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2008 9:50:00 PM > Subject: Bizarre DisMax behavior: "q" parameter not working but "q.alt" is, > and multi-valued fields not matching at all > >

Bizarre DisMax behavior: "q" parameter not working but "q.alt" is, and multi-valued fields not matching at all

Config: 1. The relevant part of the solrconfig.xml: explicit 0.01 primaryCategory^2 cat^0.5 primaryCategory^2 cat^0.5 id,contentID 100 *:* 2. The relevant part of the schema.xml 3. Some

Re: Length norm on multi-valued fields

On 6/4/07 11:24 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : With a multi-valued field, is the length norm based the individual > : matched value (string) or on all the tokens in the field? I'm guessing > : that it is the latter, and I expect I could find that in the source > : or explain

Re: Length norm on multi-valued fields

: With a multi-valued field, is the length norm based the individual : matched value (string) or on all the tokens in the field? I'm guessing : that it is the latter, and I expect I could find that in the source : or explain if I looked hard enough, but maybe someone already knows. it's all tokens

Length norm on multi-valued fields

With a multi-valued field, is the length norm based the individual matched value (string) or on all the tokens in the field? I'm guessing that it is the latter, and I expect I could find that in the source or explain if I looked hard enough, but maybe someone already knows. wunder -- Walter Under