On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
> Hallo Users...
>
> At the Moment i test MultiCorae Solr, but i cant search in more than one
> core direktly..
>
> Exist a way to use multiindex, 3-5 Indizes in one core ans search direkty
> in
> all? ore only in one?
>
>
>
You can search on all
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bhuvi HN wrote:
> Hi all
> I am in need of using single Solr instance for multi indexing. Please let
> me
> know if this is possble to do.
>
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
As a best practice, consider de-normalizing your data, if possible.
--
Hi all
I am in need of using single Solr instance for multi indexing. Please let me
know if this is possble to do.
Regards
Bhuvi
Hallo Users...
At the Moment i test MultiCorae Solr, but i cant search in more than one
core direktly..
Exist a way to use multiindex, 3-5 Indizes in one core ans search direkty in
all? ore only in one?
it is realy important or my Projekt.
Thanks
King
Matt Weber schrieb:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
Thanks, Mark. Your explanation and the pointer to the Wiki have
clarified things for me.
Michael Ludwig
e
our data is small.
Thanks,
Kalyan Manepalli
-Original Message-
From: Chris Masters [mailto:roti...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multi-index Design
Hi All,
I'm [still!] evaluating Solr and setting up a PoC. The requi
1 - A field that is called "type" which is probably a string field
that you index values such as "people", "organization", "product".
2 - Yes, for each document you are indexing, you will include it's
type, ie. "person"
3, 4, 5 - You would have a core for each domain. Each domain will
th
Chris Masters schrieb:
- flatten the searchable objects as much as I can - use a type field
to distinguish - into a single index
- use multi-core approach to segregate domains of data
Some newbie questions:
(1) What is a "type field"? Is it to designate different types of
documents, e.g.
ecs, query complexity and rate.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Chris Masters
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 10:59:40 AM
> Subject: Multi-index Design
>
>
> Hi All,
>
&g
More precisely, we use a single core, flat schema, with a type field.
wunder
On 5/5/09 8:48 AM, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> That is how we do it at Netflix. --wunder
>
> On 5/5/09 7:59 AM, "Chris Masters" wrote:
>
>> 1) Is this approach/design sensible and do others use it?
>
That is how we do it at Netflix. --wunder
On 5/5/09 7:59 AM, "Chris Masters" wrote:
> 1) Is this approach/design sensible and do others use it?
Hi All,
I'm [still!] evaluating Solr and setting up a PoC. The requirements are to
index the following objects:
- people - name, status, date added, address, profile, other people specific
fields like group...
- organisations - name, status, date added, address, profile, other
organisationa
Kirk Beers wrote:
Kirk Beers wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in using solr and I ran the tutorial but I was
wondering if it supports multi-index searching ?
Kirk
Allow me to clear that up! I would like to have the documents of 2
indices returned at once. Does solr support that ? Or am will it
Kirk Beers wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in using solr and I ran the tutorial but I was
wondering if it supports multi-index searching ?
Kirk
Allow me to clear that up! I would like to have the documents of 2
indices returned at once. Does solr support that ? Or am will it only
return the
Hi,
I am interested in using solr and I ran the tutorial but I was wondering
if it supports multi-index searching ?
Kirk
On 14-May-07, at 10:05 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to perform that sort
manually.
i mean merged results(from 60 p) and sort it, not solr's sort.
ev
maybe full-text search sort correct not very import.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
>
> > thks for your detail answer.
> >
> > but u ignore "sorted by score"
> >
> > p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
> thks for your detail answer.
>
> but u ignore "sorted by score"
>
> p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
>
> maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
>
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the c
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to pe
Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >
>> > On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
>> >
>> > > if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
>> > > correctly?
>> > >
>> > > for example, i
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
so it will not sorted by score correctly.
and if user click page 2 to see, how to show data?
p1 start from 10 or query other partitions?
2007/5/15, Mike Kl
e the docs from 0 to N for each partition (whether
through one request or multiple).
-Mike
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
>
> > if use multi index box,
On 14-May-07, at 6:49 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
When you get up to 60 partitions, you should make it a multi stage
process. Assuming your partitions are disjoint and evenly
distributed, estimate the number of do
if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result which fits query.
how to set start when pagination.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
>
> > if use multi index
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
> if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
> correctly?
>
> for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
> score.
>
> i don'
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
correctly?
for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
score.
i don't know the num found from every index box which have different
content.
if
if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score correctly?
for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by score.
i don't know the num found from every index box which have different
content.
if promise 10 page with sort score correctly, i think s
in to one class to
manage
pipes communication between multiple child processes effectively.
On 4/26/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> php not support multi thread,,,and how can u solve with multi index in
> parallel？
>
> now i use curl_multi
>
> maybe more effect way i do
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
php not support multi thread,,,and how can u solve with multi index in
parallel？
now i use curl_multi
maybe more effect way i don't know,,,so if u know, tell me. thks.
--
regards
jl
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
php not support multi thread,,,and how can u solve with multi index in
parallel？
now i use curl_multi
maybe more effect way i don't know,,,so if u know, tell me. thks.
--
regards
jl
xperience.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2007 1:57:07 AM
Subject: Re: Does so
py -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2007 1:57:07 AM
Subject: Re: Does solr support Multi index and return by score and datetime
2007/4/5, Otis Gos
luck!
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2007 1:18:30 AM
Subject: Re: Does solr support Multi in
Anyone have problem like this and how to solve it?
2007/4/5, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I think it is part of full-text search.
> >
> > I think query slavers and combin result by sco
ginal Message
From: James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2007 1:18:30 AM
Subject: Re: Does solr support Multi index and return by score and datetime
Anyone have problem like this and how to solve it?
2007/4/5, James liu <[E
2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think it is part of full-text search.
>
> I think query slavers and combin result by score should be the part of
solr.
>
> I find it http://dev.lucene-ws.net/wiki/MultiIndexOperations
> but i wanna
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it is part of full-text search.
I think query slavers and combin result by score should be the part of solr.
I find it http://dev.lucene-ws.net/wiki/MultiIndexOperations
but i wanna use solr and i like it.
Now i wanna find a good met
2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That means now i can' solve it with solr?
> >
> > Not out-of-the-box, no. But you can certainly que
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That means now i can' solve it with solr?
>
> Not out-of-the-box, no. But you can certainly query your slaves
> independently can combine based on sco
2007/4/5, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That means now i can' solve it with solr?
Not out-of-the-box, no. But you can certainly query your slaves
independently can combine based on score.
I think it is part of full-text search.
If you doc
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That means now i can' solve it with solr?
Not out-of-the-box, no. But you can certainly query your slaves
independently can combine based on score. If you document
distribution is uniform random, then the norms converge to
approximately equal va
That means now i can' solve it with solr?
2007/4/4, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i find it http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FederatedSearch
That was design brainstorming. Nothing there has been implemented,
and it's not currently at the top
On 4/4/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i find it http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FederatedSearch
That was design brainstorming. Nothing there has been implemented,
and it's not currently at the top of my personal todo list.
-Yonik
if solr not support multi index.
--
regards
jl
--
regards
jl
i have a project, it have 100g data, now i have 3-4 server for solr.
so i wanna use multi solr to decrease index's time.
but how to search by using solr, if solr not support multi index.
--
regards
jl
45 matches
Mail list logo
