On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> : Here is the relevant part of solrconfig. Note that we have added a
> : JaroWinkler fuzzy search, so the dismax specs have extra decoration.
>
> ...can you elaborate on your JaroWinkler customizations? is it possible
> that the Query obje
H ... I'm wondering if the Lucene/Solr version changes are a red
herring here ... at first blush all of these symptoms sound like invalid
cache hits...
: I'm seeing a really weird problem with Solr 1.3. The best match for a
: query will not show up with 10 rows, but will show up if I reque
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Hmm, this was fixed by restarting Solr.
That's a bit spooky.
> When does Solr/Lucene check for index file formats? We switched from
> a Lucene 1.9 index to a Lucene 2.4 index without a restart. Could that
> cause this?
It should be whene
Hmm, this was fixed by restarting Solr.
When does Solr/Lucene check for index file formats? We switched from
a Lucene 1.9 index to a Lucene 2.4 index without a restart. Could that
cause this?
wunder
On 1/8/09 11:40 AM, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> I'm seeing a really weird problem with Solr 1.3
I'm seeing a really weird problem with Solr 1.3. The best match for a
query will not show up with 10 rows, but will show up if I request more,
sometimes 200, sometimes it takes 1000 rows.
I tried increasing the row size by 10 and with some of those increments,
the first hit would change to a more
