Hi Roman,
Ok, I will. Thanks!
Cheers,
Dmitry
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Yes, it is indeed jmeter issue (or rather, the
> issue of the plugin we use to generate charts). You may want to use the
> github for whatever comes next
>
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, it is indeed jmeter issue (or rather, the
issue of the plugin we use to generate charts). You may want to use the
github for whatever comes next
https://github.com/romanchyla/solrjmeter/issues
Cheers,
roman
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dmitry Kan
Hi Roman,
Thanks, the --additionalSolrParams was just what I wanted and works fine.
BTW, if you have some special "bug tracking forum" for the tool, I'm happy
to submit questions / bug reports there. Otherwise, this email list is ok
(for me at least).
One other thing I have noticed in the err lo
Hi Dmitry,
If it is something you want to pass with every request (which is my use
case), you can pass it as additional solr params, eg.
python solrjmeter
--additionalSolrParams="fq=other_field:bar+facet=true+facet.field=facet_field_name"
the string should be url encoded.
If it is somethin
Hi Erick,
Agree, this is perfectly fine to mix them in solr. But my question is about
solrjmeter input query format. Just couldn't find a suitable example on the
solrjmeter's github.
Dmitry
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> filter and facet queries can be freely intermix
filter and facet queries can be freely intermixed, it's not a problem.
What problem are you seeing when you try this?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
>
> Would something like this work:
>
> fi
Hi Roman,
What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
Would something like this work:
field:foo >=50 fq=other_field:bar facet=true facet.field=facet_field_name
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> With adminPath="/admin" or adminP
Hi Roman,
With adminPath="/admin" or adminPath="/admin/cores", no. Interestingly
enough, though, I can access
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/system
But I can access http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores, only when with
adminPath="/admin/cores" (which suggests that this is the right
Hi Dmitry,
So it seems solrjmeter should not assume the adminPath - and perhaps needs
to be passed as an argument. When you set the adminPath, are you able to
access localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/cores ?
roman
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I have not
Hi Roman,
I have noticed a difference with different solr.xml config contents. It is
probably legit, but thought to let you know (tests run on fresh checkout as
of today).
As mentioned before, I have two cores configured in solr.xml. If the file
is:
[code]
[/code]
then the
Hi Roman,
This looks much better, thanks! The ordinary non-comarison mode works. I'll
post here, if there are other findings.
Thanks for quick turnarounds,
Dmitry
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> Hi Dmitry, oh yes, late night fixes... :) The latest commit should make it
Hi Dmitry, oh yes, late night fixes... :) The latest commit should make it
work for you.
Thanks!
roman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> Something bad happened in fresh checkout:
>
> python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
> ./queries/demo/demo.qu
Hi Roman,
Something bad happened in fresh checkout:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
./queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost -p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R
cms -t /solr/statements -e statements -U 100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1392,
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> Good point. I managed to run the command with -C and double quotes:
>
> python solrjmeter.py -a -C "g1,cms" -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
>
> As a result got several files (html, css, js, csv) in the running dir
Hi Roman,
Good point. I managed to run the command with -C and double quotes:
python solrjmeter.py -a -C "g1,cms" -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
As a result got several files (html, css, js, csv) in the running directory
(any way to specify where the output should be stored in this case?)
W
Hi Dmitry,
The command seems good. Are you sure your shell is not doing something
funny with the params? You could try:
python solrjmeter.py -C "g1,foo" -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -a
where g1 and foo are results of the individual runs, ie. something that was
started and saved with '-R g1'
Hi Roman,
One more question. I tried to compare different runs (g1 vs cms) using the
command below, but get an error. Should I attach some other param(s)?
python solrjmeter.py -C g1,foo -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
**ERROR**
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1427, in
main(sys.argv)
File
Hi Roman,
Finally, this has worked! Thanks for quick support.
The graphs look awesome. At least on the index sample :) It is quite easy
to setup and run + possible to run directly on the shard server in
background mode.
my test run was:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
./qu
Hi Dmitry,
I've modified the solrjmeter to retrieve data from under the core (the -t
parameter) and the rest from the /solr/admin - I could test it only against
4.0, but it is there the same as 4.3 - it seems...so you can try the fresh
checkout
my test was: python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQu
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification, Shawn!
So with this in mind, the following work:
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/system?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/mbeans?wt=json
not copying their output to save space.
Roman:
is this something that should be set via -t p
On 8/6/2013 6:17 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Of three URLs you asked for, only the 3rd one gave response:
> The rest report 404.
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>> So I think the admin pages are different on your version of solr, what do
>> you see when you re
Hi Roman,
With fresh checkout, the reported admin_endpoint is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin. This url redirects to
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/ . I'm using solr 4.3.1. Is your tool
supporting this version?
Of three URLs you asked for, only the 3rd one gave response:
{"responseHeader":{"stat
Hi Dmitry,
So I think the admin pages are different on your version of solr, what do
you see when you request... ?
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/system?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/mbeans?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?wt=json
If your core -t was '/solr/statements',
Hi Roman,
No problem. Still trying to launch the thing..
The query with the added -t parameter generated an error:
1. python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
./queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost -p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R
test -t /solr/statements [passed relative path
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks, It was a toothing problem, fixed now, please try the fresh checkout
AND add the following to your arguments: -t /solr/core1
that sets the path under which solr should be contacted, the handler is set
in the jmeter configuration, so if you were using different query handlers
tha
Hi Roman,
Sure:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost
-p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R test
This is vanilla install (git clone) except for one change that I had to do
related to solr cores:
> git diff
d
8 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run
> with
> >> added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting
> confused
> >> ;)
> >>
> >>
> http://29min.wordpress.co
gt;> http://29min.wordpress.com/**2013/08/01/measuring-solr-**performance-ii/<http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/>
>>
>
> I am having a very difficult time with the graphs. I have no idea what
> I'm looking at. The graphs are probably
On 8/1/2013 2:08 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run with
added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting confused ;)
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/
I am having a very difficult
Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run with
added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting confused ;)
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/
roman
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> I&#
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Yes, UseNuma is only for Parallel Scavenger garbage collector and only
> for Solaris 9 and higher and Linux kernel 2.6.19 and glibc 2.6.1.
> And it performs with 64-bit better than 32-bit.
> So no
Dmitry,
Can you post the entire invocation line?
roman
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> When I try to run with -q
> /home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
>
> here what is reported:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "solrjmete
Hi Roman,
When I try to run with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
here what is reported:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1390, in
main(sys.argv)
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1309, in main
tests = find_tests(options)
File
Yes, UseNuma is only for Parallel Scavenger garbage collector and only
for Solaris 9 and higher and Linux kernel 2.6.19 and glibc 2.6.1.
And it performs with 64-bit better than 32-bit.
So no effects for G1.
With standard applications CMS is very slightly better than G1 but
when it comes to huge he
gt; Load is obviously higher with G1GC.
>
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Roman Chyla
> > Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013 18:32
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Measuring SOLR performance
> >
> > I'll try to run it with the new paramete
1GC!
Load is obviously higher with G1GC.
-Original message-
> From:Roman Chyla
> Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013 18:32
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Measuring SOLR performance
>
> I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how
I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how it goes.
I've rechecked details for the G1 (default) garbage collector run and I can
confirm that 2 out of 3 runs were showing high max response times, in some
cases even 10secs, but the customized G1 never - so definitely the
paramete
Hi Dmitry,
probably mistake in the readme, try calling it with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
as for the base_url, i was testing it on solr4.0, where it tries contactin
/solr/admin/system - is it different for 4.3? I guess I should make it
configurable (it alread
On 7/31/2013 12:24 AM, William Bell wrote:
> But that link does not tell me which on you are using?
>
> You are listing like 4 versions on your site.
>
> Also, what did it fix? Pause times?
>
>
> Any other words of wisdom ?
I'm not sure whether that was directed at me or Roman, but here's my
a
Ok, got the error fixed by modifying the base solr ulr in solrjmeter.py
(added core name after /solr part).
Next error is:
WARNING: no test name(s) supplied nor found in:
['/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/demo/queries/demo.queries']
It is a 'slow start with new tool' symptom I guess.. :)
O
Hi Roman,
What version and config of SOLR does the tool expect?
Tried to run, but got:
**ERROR**
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1390, in
main(sys.argv)
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1296, in main
check_prerequisities(options)
File "solrjmeter.py", line 351, in check_prerequisities
e
But that link does not tell me which on you are using?
You are listing like 4 versions on your site.
Also, what did it fix? Pause times?
Any other words of wisdom ?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/30/2013 6:59 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> > I have been wanting some
On 7/30/2013 6:59 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> I have been wanting some tools for measuring performance of SOLR, similar
> to Mike McCandles' lucene benchmark.
>
> so yet another monitor was born, is described here:
> http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/measuring-solr-query-performance/
>
> I teste
Hello,
I have been wanting some tools for measuring performance of SOLR, similar
to Mike McCandles' lucene benchmark.
so yet another monitor was born, is described here:
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/measuring-solr-query-performance/
I tested it on the problem of garbage collectors (see
44 matches
Mail list logo
