wow ,30k in under 3 seconds
On 10/30/08, Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've actually seen cases on our site where it's possible to bring up
> over 30,000 facets for one query. And they actually come up quickly -
> like, 3 seconds. It takes longer for the browser to render them.
I understand what you mean..I am building a system that will
dynammically generate facets which could possible be thousands , but
at most about 6 or 7 facets will be returned using a facet ranking
algorithm so I get what you mean if I request in my query that I
want 1000 faets back compared to
I've actually seen cases on our site where it's possible to bring up
over 30,000 facets for one query. And they actually come up quickly -
like, 3 seconds. It takes longer for the browser to render them.
--
Steve
On Oct 30, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
the only 'limit' is th
the only 'limit' is the effect on your query times... you could have
1000+ facets if you are ok with the response time.
Sorry to give the "it depends" answer, but it totally depends on your
data and your needs.
On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
is there a limit on the numb
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Jeryl Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a limit on the number of facets that i can create in
> Solr?(dynamically generated facets.)
Not really, It's practically limited by CPU and memory, which can vary
widely with what the facet fields look like (number o
is there a limit on the number of facets that i can create in
Solr?(dynamically generated facets.)
--
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our
enemies, justice will be done."
--George W. Bush, Address to a Join
