Re: Master -> Master replication

2008-06-10 Thread Jacob Singh
gt; > > - Original Message >> From: Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:33:10 AM >> Subject: Master -> Master replication >> >> Hi again :) >> >> I'm also

Re: Master -> Master replication

2008-06-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
on a SAN) and avoid index replication, thus minimizing interruption time. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:33:10 A

Master -> Master replication

2008-06-10 Thread Jacob Singh
Hi again :) I'm also working on a scenario where there is an architecture like this: (here comes poor man's Visio) M2 | M1 | --- / \ S1 S2 The catch is M2 isn't always online. The idea being, M1 is online to take small updates like removing a certain entry from index or one off ch