do alot of
> filtering and alteration to query during query time, we could do the same
> for stemming in the same way.
>
> Thanks again,
> -Kamran
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14440871.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
/www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14440871.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:46:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Making stemming dynamic at query time
>
>
> The easiest is probably to have two copies of your field, using
> , one stemmed and one not, and search in one or the other.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> Ye
M
Subject: Re: Making stemming dynamic at query time
The easiest is probably to have two copies of your field, using
, one stemmed and one not, and search in one or the other.
-Bertrand
Yes, I knew this, but it costs me too much, in my case having more than
65M
records and saving most of the fi
not work. I am looking for making it as option. it is good to
have index everything stemmed but at query time make it optional to filter
query stemmed or not
Thanks,
-Kamran
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14418260.html
Sent
On Dec 18, 2007 9:41 PM, Kamran Shadkhast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...it would be great if we could dynamiclly control this during
> search if we want to search with stemming or not
The easiest is probably to have two copies of your field, using
, one stemmed and one not, and search in on
://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14405260.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
