hul
> > On Jul 13, 2018, 9:59 AM -0400, rgummadi ,
> wrote:
> >> Is SiLK from LucidWorks still an acitve project. I looked at their
> github and
> >> it does not seem to be active. If so are there any alternative
> solutions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
>
;
> Rahul
> On Jul 13, 2018, 9:59 AM -0400, rgummadi , wrote:
>> Is SiLK from LucidWorks still an acitve project. I looked at their github and
>> it does not seem to be active. If so are there any alternative solutions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Their commercial offering still has something like it. You can always try
Grafana
Rahul
On Jul 13, 2018, 9:59 AM -0400, rgummadi , wrote:
> Is SiLK from LucidWorks still an acitve project. I looked at their github and
> it does not seem to be active. If so are there any alternative sol
Is SiLK from LucidWorks still an acitve project. I looked at their github and
it does not seem to be active. If so are there any alternative solutions.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
---
> From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:anura...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 12:23 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Lucidworks Fusion 1.0.0
>
> I downloaded fusion and tried to run it on windows 8 using cygwin. It's
> giving "Error: Unable
Well, the current release is only supported on Linux. A Windows compatible
release is planned for later this year.
-Original Message-
From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:anura...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 12:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lucidworks
gt; > DC? (Not listed in the program yet).
> > >
> > >
> > > Thomas Egense
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> We at Lucid
cene/Solr
> Revolution
> > DC? (Not listed in the program yet).
> >
> >
> > Thomas Egense
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We at Lucidworks are pleased to announce the
resentation at Lucene/Solr
> Revolution
> > DC? (Not listed in the program yet).
> >
> >
> > Thomas Egense
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We at Lucidworks are plea
Sep 23, 2014, at 2:00 AM, Thomas Egense wrote:
> Hi Grant.
> Will there be a Fusion demostration/presentation at Lucene/Solr Revolution
> DC? (Not listed in the program yet).
>
>
> Thomas Egense
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll
> wrote:
>
>
you can register for webinar also to know more about Fusion on Oct 2nd.
http://lucidworks.com/blog/say-hello-to-lucidworks-fusion/
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> You simply download it yourself and give yourself a demo!!
>
> http://lucidworks.com/produ
You simply download it yourself and give yourself a demo!!
http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Egense
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lucidworks Fusion 1.0.0
Hi Grant
Hi Grant.
Will there be a Fusion demostration/presentation at Lucene/Solr Revolution
DC? (Not listed in the program yet).
Thomas Egense
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We at Lucidworks are pleased to announce the release of Lucidworks Fus
Hi All,
We at Lucidworks are pleased to announce the release of Lucidworks Fusion 1.0.
Fusion is built to overlay on top of Solr (in fact, you can manage multiple
Solr clusters -- think QA, staging and production -- all from our Admin).In
other words, if you already have Solr, simply
Is LucidWorks source no longer available? In earlier versions their
source code was available but after the latest install I can not seem to
find it?
On Apr 3, 2011, at 6:56am, yehosef wrote:
> How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
> apache license?
It's the difference between free speech and free beer :)
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
+1
Take "Lucidworks for Solr", it's free.
Regards, Wolfram
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yehosef [mailto:yeho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2011 15:57
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Difference between Solr and Lucidworks distribution
How can they
How can they require payment for something that was developed under the
apache license?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Difference-between-Solr-and-Lucidworks-distribution-tp2474792p2771191.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt;
>> Now I'm confused.
>>
>> In http://www.lucidimagination.com/lwe/subscriptions-and-pricing, the price
>> of LucidWorks Enterprise Software is stated as "FREE". I thought the price
>> for "Production" was for the support service, not for
ee the office distro version change from
Lucid.
Thanks for all hard work the Lucid Team has provided over the years!
Adam
On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Andy wrote:
> Now I'm confused.
>
> In http://www.lucidimagination.com/lwe/subscriptions-and-pricing, the price
> of LucidW
Now I'm confused.
In http://www.lucidimagination.com/lwe/subscriptions-and-pricing, the price of
LucidWorks Enterprise Software is stated as "FREE". I thought the price for
"Production" was for the support service, not for the software.
But you seem to be saying that &
There are two distributions.
The company is Lucid Imagination. 'Lucidworks for Solr' is the
certified distribution of Solr 1.4.1, with several enhancements.
Markus refers to 'LucidWorks Enterprise', which is LWE. This is a
separate app with tools and a REST API for mana
It is not free for production environments.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/lwe/subscriptions-and-pricing
On Friday 11 February 2011 17:31:22 Greg Georges wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just started watching the webinars from Lucidworks, and they mention
> their distribution which has
Hello all,
I just started watching the webinars from Lucidworks, and they mention their
distribution which has an installer, etc.. Is there any other differences? Is
it a good idea to use this free distribution?
Greg
Hi,
I'm trying to reuse schema.xml and solrconfig.xml from /lucidworks/solr/conf
in the /multicore/core0/conf,
specifically to index binary files, and have some loading problems, like
NullPointers, etrc.
What are the steps to do it correctly?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
Congrats!
A couple questions:
1) Which version of Solr is this based on?
2) How is LWE different from standard Solr? How should one choose between the
two?
Thanks.
--- On Wed, 12/15/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> Subject: [ANN] General Availability of Luci
Lucid Imagination is pleased to announce the general availability of our Apache
Solr/Lucene powered LucidWorks Enterprise (LWE). LWE is designed to make it
easier for people to get up to speed on search by providing easier management,
integration with libraries commonly used in building search
aster with Apache Solr and LucidWorks Enterprise"
Thursday, December 16, 2010
11:00 AM PST / 2:00 PM EST / 20:00 CET
Click here to sign up
http://www.eventsvc.com/lucidimagination/121610?trk=AP
In the key dimensions of search relevancy and query-targeted results,
users have become accusto
l change and recompile.
>
> Is there a LucidWorks (tomcat) build somewhere?
>
> Regards
> ericz
>
>
>
>
>
Good Morning, afternoon or evening...
If someone installed Solr using the LucidWorks.jar (1.4) installation how
can one make a small change and recompile.
Is there a LucidWorks (tomcat) build somewhere?
Regards
ericz
Sorry, please ignore my previous message, I figured it out. (That is, use
the console mode)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, joyce chan wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know how to install LucidWorks Solr (LucidWorks.jar) without
> the gui installer? Or maybe to do it as a si
Hi
Does anybody know how to install LucidWorks Solr (LucidWorks.jar) without
the gui installer? Or maybe to do it as a silent install?
Thanks
Joyce
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Shashi Kant wrote:
> Why do these approaches have to be mutually exclusive?
> Do a dictionary lookup, if no satisfactory match found use an
> algorithmic stemmer. Would probably save a few CPU cycles by
> algorithmic stemming iff necessary.
>
>
by the way, if you
e tolerant and made for highly
relevant search results without exact matching.
Kind regards
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p741090.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> Stemming/lematization will pretty much always improve recall at the cost of
> precision - that's nothing new. If you stem instead, are you going to want
> documents that had run and water when you searched for running water? I just
> don't s
On 4/21/10 3:22 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Its an orthogonal issue - running will have that problem no matter what. It
doesn't affect whether a user that types running may be just as interested
in a doc that matches all of their other terms bu
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> Its an orthogonal issue - running will have that problem no matter what. It
> doesn't affect whether a user that types running may be just as interested
> in a doc that matches all of their other terms but has ran instead of
> running. Its al
IMHO, a 'stemmer' (being a specific 'thing') is exactly that. An
algorithm for stemming. A database or lexicon is not referred to as a
'stemmer'. One can perform "stemming" using a lexicon if that's their
need.
For me, its more than just stemming because some words have morphology
totally separat
On 4/21/10 2:20 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Right - I agree they both have their strengths and weakness' - but you
usually don't get things like running->ran with stemming. Like most things,
its a tradeoff. There is always a hybrid approach as
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> Right - I agree they both have their strengths and weakness' - but you
> usually don't get things like running->ran with stemming. Like most things,
> its a tradeoff. There is always a hybrid approach as well.
>
>
I think running/ran has mor
On 4/21/10 2:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
I believe that's covered by morphology?
The problem is typically a morphological analyzer emits multiple solutions,
which include POS.
So morphology can tell you that "building" has two s
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> I believe that's covered by morphology?
>
>
The problem is typically a morphological analyzer emits multiple solutions,
which include POS.
So morphology can tell you that "building" has two solutions: the gerund
form which you might stem t
On 4/21/10 1:43 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
But they don't usually call 'non algorithmic' stemming 'stemming'. Stemming
usually means using a simple heuristic process. When you use vocabulary and
morphology, its usually called lemmatization
On 4/21/10 1:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
But they don't usually call 'non algorithmic' stemming 'stemming'.
Stemming usually means using a simple heuristic process. When you use
vocabulary and morphology, its usually called lemmatization
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> But they don't usually call 'non algorithmic' stemming 'stemming'.
> Stemming usually means using a simple heuristic process. When you use
> vocabulary and morphology, its usually called lemmatization rather than
> stemming.
>
>
Lemmatizati
On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> But they don't usually call 'non algorithmic' stemming 'stemming'. Stemming
> usually means using a simple heuristic process. When you use vocabulary and
> morphology, its usually called lemmatization rather than stemming.
>
"stemmer" is jargo
Why do these approaches have to be mutually exclusive?
Do a dictionary lookup, if no satisfactory match found use an
algorithmic stemmer. Would probably save a few CPU cycles by
algorithmic stemming iff necessary.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> sy to look at the "faults" o
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Strictly speaking: you haven't "ditched" stemmers altogether -- you've
> ditched *algorithmic* stemmers and moved to a *dictionary* based stemmer
> -- but it's still a stemmer.
>
> (i just don't want people reading this thread to be confus
On 4/21/10 1:18 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Regarding stemmers, I ditched them altogether a long time ago in favor
: of a dictionary of morphologies of all known words (for any given
: language). A simple lookup of any word morphology thus produces the set,
: including the correct stem.
Strictl
: Regarding stemmers, I ditched them altogether a long time ago in favor
: of a dictionary of morphologies of all known words (for any given
: language). A simple lookup of any word morphology thus produces the set,
: including the correct stem.
Strictly speaking: you haven't "ditched" stemmers a
> Andy,
>
> This will help with smooth injection of your multilingual
> documents into Solr (multilingual either in the sense of 1
> doc containing fields in multiple languages or 1 index
> containing documents in different languages):
>
> http://sematext.com/products/multilingual-indexer/inde
http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Andy
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 8:45:40 AM
> Subject: Re: LucidWorks Solr
>
> Thanks for the explanation Mitc
itive
> >> for
> >> a given word. The idea is that he produces always the same infintive for
> >> any
> >> derivate of the word.
> >>
> >> What would be, if there is an unknown word? For example something like
> >> slang? How does your so
For example something like
>> slang? How does your solution works here? Does it scale?
>>
>> Thank you for sharing experiences. :)
>>
>> - Mitch
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p730059.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
your solution works here? Does it scale?
>
> Thank you for sharing experiences. :)
>
> - Mitch
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p730059.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
s the application works as expected.
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p730160.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
produces always the same infintive for
> any
> derivate of the word.
>
> What would be, if there is an unknown word? For example something like
> slang? How does your solution works here? Does it scale?
>
> Thank you for sharing experiences. :)
>
> - Mitch
> --
> View t
works here? Does it scale?
Thank you for sharing experiences. :)
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p730059.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
>> From: Darren Govoni
>> Subject: Re: LucidWorks Solr
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 7:39 AM
>> Regarding stemmers, I ditched them
>> altogether a long time ago in favor
&
Thanks for the tip.
Are there any publicly available dictionary of morphologies that I could use?
Or did you build your own one?
--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Darren Govoni wrote:
> From: Darren Govoni
> Subject: Re: LucidWorks Solr
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, April
ded way to deal with documents in multiple languages?
--- On Mon, 4/19/10, MitchK wrote:
> From: MitchK
> Subject: Re: LucidWorks Solr
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 4:36 AM
>
> Andy, I think it is important to know what a stemmer reall
Regarding stemmers, I ditched them altogether a long time ago in favor
of a dictionary of morphologies of all known words (for any given
language). A simple lookup of any word morphology thus produces the set,
including the correct stem.
Works great. 100% of the time.
Just a tip from me.
On Mon
ntext:
http://n3.nabble.com/LucidWorks-Solr-tp727341p729110.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Sure, but I'm biased. ;-) Hopefully, you will find it
> useful, but choose the one that best fits your needs (and
> let me know if you need help assessing that.)
>
Thanks for the explanation Grant.
WHat is the advantage of KStem over the sta
On Apr 18, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Andy wrote:
> Just wanted to know if anyone has used LucidWorks Solr.
>
> - How do you compare it to the standard Apache Solr?
We take a release of Solr. We wrap it w/ an installer, tomcat/jetty, our
reference guide, Luke, etc. We also add in an
Thanks for asking, I am interested as well in reading the response to
your questions.
Paolo
Andy wrote:
Just wanted to know if anyone has used LucidWorks Solr.
- How do you compare it to the standard Apache Solr?
- the non-blocking IO of LucidWorks Solr -- is that for networking IO or disk
Just wanted to know if anyone has used LucidWorks Solr.
- How do you compare it to the standard Apache Solr?
- the non-blocking IO of LucidWorks Solr -- is that for networking IO or disk
IO? what are its effects?
- LucidWorks website also talked about "significantly improved fac
hough.
And I just took the war in LucidWorks\dist. I think in the install
instructions, there was also a script to apply to the included source code as
well. I did that as well since I look at the source regularly.
I didn't look at LudidGlaze or any of the other Lucid feature
Kevin,
When you say you just included the war you mean the /packs/solr.war correct?
I see that the KStemmer is nicely packed in there but I don't see LucidGaze
anywhere. Have you had any experience using this?
So I'm guessing you would suggest using the LucidWorks solr.war over the
a
I'm trying it out right now. I hope it will work well out-of-box for
indexing/searching a set of documents with frequent update.
-aj
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:52 AM, blargy wrote:
>
> Has anyone used this?:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/Downloads/LucidWorks-for-Solr
>
y
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 11:52:17 AM
Subject: LucidWorks Solr
Has anyone used this?:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Downloads/LucidWorks-for-Solr
Other than the KStemmer and installer what are the other "enhancements" that
this download offers? Is
apache.org
Sent: Friday, 5 February, 2010 6:07:03 PM
Subject: SV: Running Solr (LucidWorks) as a Windows Server
Hi All,
Thanks a lot for your help in this.
I have tried to use the Win32Wrapper, and the Jetty-Service.exe but still no
success.
I was actually hoping the some of you guys
...
Roland
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Ron Chan [mailto:rc...@i-tao.com]
Sendt: 5. februar 2010 12:55
Til: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Emne: Re: Running Solr (LucidWorks) as a Windows Server
jetty can be run as a Windows Service, see
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Win32Wrapper
jetty can be run as a Windows Service, see
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Win32Wrapper
- Original Message -
From: "Roland Villemoes"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 February, 2010 7:18:57 PM
Subject: Running Solr (LucidWorks) as a Windows S
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> What about using Tomcat instead? Tomcat has Windows service capability
> already, right?
Another part of the problem is telling the solr webapp where it's solr home is.
Options:
- use a tomcat context fragment (described in
http://wiki.apac
What about using Tomcat instead? Tomcat has Windows service
capability already, right?
Erik
On Feb 4, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Roland Villemoes wrote:
Hi,
I need to have Solr/Jetty running as a Windows Service.
I am using the Lucid distribution.
Does anyone have a running example and to
Hi,
I need to have Solr/Jetty running as a Windows Service.
I am using the Lucid distribution.
Does anyone have a running example and tool for this?
med venlig hilsen/best regards
Roland Villemoes
Tel: (+45) 22 69 59 62
E-Mail: mailto:r...@alpha-solutions.dk
Alpha Solutions A/S
Borgergade 2,
I am using LucidWorks Solr v1.4 and I would like to compile in a search
component, however it does not seem like a very straightforward process. The
ant script in the solr directory is that of the stock solr installation
which does not compile out of the box.
Has anyone been able to successfully
78 matches
Mail list logo
