Agreed, Solr uses random access bitsets everywhere so I'm thinking
this could be an improvement or at least a great option to enable and
try out. I'll update LUCENE-1536 so we can benchmark.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Grant Ingerso
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I am wondering... are new SOLR filtering features faster than standard
>> Lucene queries like
>> {query} AND {filter}???
>
> The new filtering features in Solr are just doing what Lucene started doing
> in 2.4 and that is using skipping wh
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1179
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-26-09 8:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Lucene Search Performance Analysis Workshop
While Andrzej's talk will focus on things at the Lucene layer
PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Lucene Search Performance Analysis Workshop
While Andrzej's talk will focus on things at the Lucene layer, I'm
sure there'll be some great tips and tricks useful to Solrians too.
Andrzej is one of the sharpest folks I've
ssage-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-26-09 8:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Lucene Search Performance Analysis Workshop
While Andrzej's talk will focus on things at the Lucene layer, I'm
sure there'll be some great tips
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andrzej Bialecki
Date: August 26, 2009 5:44:40 PM EDT
To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Lucene Search Performance Analysis Workshop
Reply-To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org
Hi all,
I am giving a free talk/ workshop next week on how to analyze and
improve Luce
