Re: LTR original score feature

-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: LTR original score feature >It seems to me that the original score feature is not useful because it is not normalized across all queries and therefore cannot be used to compare relevance in different queries. I don't agree with this statement and it&#x

Re: LTR original score feature

is not normalized across all queries and > therefore cannot be used to compare relevance in different queries. > > -Original Message- > From: alessandro.benedetti [mailto:a.benede...@sease.io] > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 10:22 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or

RE: LTR original score feature

eries. -Original Message- From: alessandro.benedetti [mailto:a.benede...@sease.io] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 10:22 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: LTR original score feature This is actually an interesting point. The original Solr score alone will mean nothing, the ranking positi

Re: LTR original score feature

This is actually an interesting point. The original Solr score alone will mean nothing, the ranking position of the document would be a more relevant feature at that stage. When you put the original score together with the rest of features, it may be of potential usage ( number of query terms, tf

Re: LTR original score feature

What you're suggesting is that there's a "nonlinear relationship " between the original score (the input variable) and some measure of "relevance" (the outpu

LTR original score feature

I wanted to get some opinions on using the original score feature. The original score produced by Solr is intuitively a very important feature. In my data set I'm seeing that the original score varies wildly between different queries. This makes sense since the score generated by Solr is not nor