We should get that done!! :)
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/5/2015 10:11 PM, William Bell wrote:
> > Has anyone used solr.LFUCache in Production to replace:
> >
> > >
> > size="4096"
> >
> > initialSize="4096" cleanupThread="true"
> > autowarmCount
On 7/5/2015 10:11 PM, William Bell wrote:
> Has anyone used solr.LFUCache in Production to replace:
>
>
> size="4096"
>
> initialSize="4096" cleanupThread="true"
> autowarmCount="32"/>
>
> Thoughts?
I wrote the LFUCache.
It's the most basic and naive implementation possibl
What is exactly your question ? I mean, what is the problem you are seeing
using FastLRUCache?
What is not convincing you in using the LFU ( it that one solves your
requirement? )
Cheers
2015-07-06 5:11 GMT+01:00 William Bell :
> Has anyone used solr.LFUCache in Production to replace:
>
>
>
Has anyone used solr.LFUCache in Production to replace:
Thoughts?
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076