15 at 7:42 AM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
>
> > I have create 3 cores on same machine using solrlcoud.
> > core: Restaurant,User,Review
> > each of core has only 1 shards and 2 replicas.
> >
> > Question
> > 1.) It is possible to use join among 3 of cores on same machine( or
> > different machine)
> > 2.)I am struggling how to use join among 3 of core in solrlcoud mode.
> >
> > Client: is not interested to de-normalized data.
> >
> > Give some suggestion how to solved that problem.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mugeesh
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4243957.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
t; core: Restaurant,User,Review
>> each of core has only 1 shards and 2 replicas.
>>
>> Question
>> 1.) It is possible to use join among 3 of cores on same machine( or
>> different machine)
>> 2.)I am struggling how to use join among 3 of core in solrlcoud mode.
>>
>> Client: is not interested to de-normalized data.
>>
>> Give some suggestion how to solved that problem.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mugeesh
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4243957.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
gt; each of core has only 1 shards and 2 replicas.
>
> Question
> 1.) It is possible to use join among 3 of cores on same machine( or
> different machine)
> 2.)I am struggling how to use join among 3 of core in solrlcoud mode.
>
> Client: is not interested to de-normalized data.
.
Client: is not interested to de-normalized data.
Give some suggestion how to solved that problem.
Thanks
Mugeesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4243957.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
tever
> - user17, yeah
>
> or do all the results of the main query need to reside on the same shard as
> all the results of join.
>
> Hopefully that's an understandable question.
>
> Thanks,
>
> slevytam
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
slevytam
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4073199p4075408.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:40 PM, slevytam wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> Can you offer any insight as to how one might ensure that documents reside
> on the same shard as the document you'd like them to join.
>
> For example:
> I'd like to do a simple join of user actions to a specific document. So, i
> w
to the same
shard as the parent document, if I knew how.
Thanks,
slevytam
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Joins-with-SolrCloud-tp4073199p4075310.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> However, if from your example, innerCollection was replicated across all
> nodes, I would think that should work, because all that comes back from
> each server when a distributed search happens is the best 'n' matches,
> so exactly how those 'n'
Thanks, confirmed by trying w/ 4.3.1 that the join works with the outer
collection distributed/sharded so long as the inner collection is not
distributed/sharded.
Chris
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I have never heard mention that joins support distributed search, so you
IRA above
-- James
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 7:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Joins with SolrCloud
I have never heard mention that joins support distributed search, so you cannot
do a join against a sharded core.
H
I have never heard mention that joins support distributed search, so you
cannot do a join against a sharded core.
However, if from your example, innerCollection was replicated across all
nodes, I would think that should work, because all that comes back from
each server when a distributed search h
What are the restrictions/limitations w.r.t. joins when using SolrCloud?
Say I have a 3-node cluster and both my "outer" and "inner" collections are
sharded 3 ways across the cluster. Could I do a query such as
"select?q={!join+from=inner_id+fromIndex=innerCollection+to=outer_id}xx:foo&collection
13 matches
Mail list logo