Many thanks Bill
Yeah I did take a look at the features of 1.4 and they do look fantastic
very much looking forward to them
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> I say it is worth upgrading since 1.2 is old. 1.4 is almost ready to be
> released. So you may want to wait a little wh
I say it is worth upgrading since 1.2 is old. 1.4 is almost ready to be
released. So you may want to wait a little while longer. There are many
nice new features in 1.4. There are performance improvement too. In the
mean time, you can just get the latest version of the scripts from SVN.
Those
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response didn't even realise I had got a reply, those
logs are from the slave and the both version of Solr are the same
Solr Implementation Version: 1.2.0 - Yonik - 2007-06-02 17:35:12
It maybe worth upgrading them?
Thank you for the assistance,
Will
On Thu, Aug 13, 2
Have you check the solr log on the slave to see if there was any commit
done? It looks to me you are still using an older version of the commit
script that is not compatible with the newer Solr response format. If
thats' the case, the commit was actually performed. It is just that the
script fai
Hello,
I am having a few problems with the snapinstaller/commit on the slave, I
have a pull_from_master script which is the following
#!/bin/bash
cd /opt/solr/solr/bin -v
./snappuller -v -P 18983
./snapinstaller -v
I have been executing snapshooter manually on the master then running the
above
