Hi Tom,
> Thanks Otis. After some further testing - I've noticed that initial searches
> are only slow if I include the qt=geo parameter. Searches without this
> parameter appear to show no slow down whatsoever after updates - so I'm
> wondering if the problem is actually a localsolr one.
>
>
ge in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Initial-query-performance-poor-after-update---delete-tp22732463p22739929.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
xt -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: TomWilliamson
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:29:42 PM
> Subject: Initial query performance poor after update / delete
>
>
> I'm developing a
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Initial-query-performance-poor-after-update---delete-tp22732463p22732463.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
