Hi Robert,
SolrJ is sending data over a socket so that might explain some of the lag.
Are is your SolrJ app and the Solr server running on the same physical
machine?
I thought Mark M's idea sounded good.
One other idea:
When initializing SolrJ's connection for normal searching you probably use
One difference is that Solr will call update rather than add by
default. If you are willing to ensure unique id's, you can specify
overwrite=false (I think thats the one) and it will use add instead.
- Mark
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Robert Stewart wrote:
> I have a project where I am port
I have a project where I am porting existing application from direct
Lucene API usage to using SOLR and SOLRJ client API.
The problem I have is that indexing is 2-5x slower using SOLRJ+SOLR
than using direct Lucene API.
I am creating batches of documents between 200 and 500 documents per
call to
