You could just have each Solr index and query from its own index, and
not copy indexes.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Anderson vasconcelos
wrote:
> Thanks for the Reply Erick
> I will make the replication to both master manually.
>
> Thanks
>
> 2012/1/25, Erick Erickson :
>> No, there no good
Thanks for the Reply Erick
I will make the replication to both master manually.
Thanks
2012/1/25, Erick Erickson :
> No, there no good ways to have a single slave know about
> two masters and just use the right one. It sounds like you've
> got each machine being both a master and a slave? This is
No, there no good ways to have a single slave know about
two masters and just use the right one. It sounds like you've
got each machine being both a master and a slave? This is
not supported. What you probably want to do is either set
up a repeater or just index to the two masters and manually
chan
Hi
I'm doing now a test with replication using solr 1.4.1. I configured
two servers (server1 and server 2) as master/slave to sincronized
both. I put apache on the front side, and we index sometime in server1
and sometime in server2.
I realized that the both index servers are now confused. In sol
