Re: Indexing API

2006-10-12 Thread Walter Underwood
I'm not impressed with OpenSearch. It is a sloppy design and not well-documented. It is heavily slanted toward what A9.com wanted to do on their website, and that stuff is all dead. Essentially, OpenSearch is a proprietary format that was published in an open manner. If you compare OpenSearch to A

Re: Indexing API

2006-10-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Oct 12, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Walter - I'm curious what your thoughts are on the OpenSearch standard as well. Do you think Solr should support that natively as well? However, I find the error handling "suggestion" in the OpenSearch developer docs unsettling:

Re: Indexing API

2006-10-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
Walter - I'm curious what your thoughts are on the OpenSearch standard as well. Do you think Solr should support that natively as well? I'm a proponent of the Atom Publishing Protocol as well, for the record. Erik On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: On 10/12/06 8

Indexing API

2006-10-12 Thread Walter Underwood
On 10/12/06 8:26 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree ... comments various people have made over the last few weeks or > so have gotten me thinking that standardizing the way errors are > returned to the HTTP client (for both updates and selects) is one of the > biggest "API