Just off the top of my head, aren't you able to use a slave as a
repeater, so it's configured as both a master and a slave?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Setting_up_a_Repeater
This would seem to require that the slave return the same values as
its master for indexversion. What happe
Yes, i read that too in the replication request handler's source comments. But
i would find it convenient if it would just use the same values as we see using
the details command.
Any devs agree? Then i'd open a ticket for this one.
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 17:14:09 Xin Li wrote:
> I read it
I read it somewhere (sorry for not remembering the source).. the
indexversion command gets the "replicable" index version #. Since it
is a slave machine, so the result is 0.
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> But why? I'd expect valid version numbers although the rep
But why? I'd expect valid version numbers although the replication handler's
source code seems to agree with you judging from the comments.
On Monday 06 December 2010 17:49:16 Xin Li wrote:
> I think this is expected behavior. You have to issue the "details"
> command to get the real indexversion
I think this is expected behavior. You have to issue the "details"
command to get the real indexversion for slave machines.
Thanks,
Xin
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The indexversion command in the replicationHandler on slave nodes returns 0
> for indexversion a
Hi,
The indexversion command in the replicationHandler on slave nodes returns 0
for indexversion and generation while the details command does return the
correct information. I haven't found an existing ticket on this one although
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1573 has similarities
